Oct 23, 2020
I learned many things from this course. However, I think in some points it could have been instructed much better. But all in all, it is a very worthy course for the price offered. Thanks a lot!
Apr 25, 2018
It was really great learning with coursera and I loved the course. The way faculty teaches here is just awesome as they are very much clear and helped a lot while learning this coursea
By Mohsen F•
Jan 3, 2021
it was not an advance course and course content and programming assignment is too easy. the whole course could bet finished in couple of days. video and presentation quality is poor.
By Nhu N•
Sep 14, 2020
This course contain very good introduction to AI and DeepLearning. Although it assumed alot of knowledge already from the students in order to follow the content effectively.
By Robert F•
Jul 4, 2020
Fairly okay course. Lectures were real hurried and high level. Had it not been for my Math and CS background I would not have gotten most of the material.
By Ceren A•
May 10, 2020
Several lectures were superficial. I feel like I need to put a lot more time on my on to understand how to build a proper neural network model.
By Michael M•
Aug 20, 2020
The programming assignments were easy. I wish it had some more difficult assignments requiring you to code your own neural networks
By Mario A C S•
Sep 15, 2020
Good course, the explanation of CNN could be better, the anomaly detection exercise it's kind out of focus
By Arman I•
Apr 14, 2021
Basic Deep learning; no programming assignment for most part of deep learning part
By ENY D F G•
Jun 30, 2021
Os vídeo disponívei no youtube estavam tinha apenas a opção de legenda em alemão
By Mark B•
Apr 17, 2020
Hard to follow ... found a lot of assistance in discussion forums
By Paul A•
Nov 22, 2021
The concepts were rushed without concise explanations.
By Mehdi R•
Apr 12, 2020
unfortunately the time series chapter is not complete
By Francesco d C•
Nov 21, 2019
The lessons provided by Skymind were very poor.
By Jennifer K•
Jul 4, 2021
Assignments are a bit too simple
By Csaba P O•
Oct 1, 2019
I liked the general idea of this course, but the actual material is not as good as it could be. There are lots of inaccuracies in the material (like annoying typos and not working code examples) which should be corrected before you sell this course on Coursera.
I strongly suggest that you go through your material with someone who has pedagogy knowledge and who can assist you to improve the didactic aspects of your material.
I did this course (and the whole specialization) for the practical examples as I feel rather confident with the theoretical aspects of machine learning, but I wanted to learn how to do these things in Spark environment. At the end of the day I have got what I wanted (more or less, as the NLP part was really lousy), but if I would not have strong experience with the field, I would have been surely lost. Honestly, I would have a hard time to recommend these courses for someone who wants to learn about machine learning and not about how to do machine learning with Keras, etc. And I am sorry to say that, because, again, I liked the team, the attitude, and the technical aspects of this course.
By Eric C•
Apr 29, 2020
There was a lot of interesting content, but I was sad that the programming assignments were fairly trivial. Any point where something deep and useful could have been assigned (I was hoping to get experience or guidance on building an LSTM autoencoder, for example) we were instead given a super easy alternative that was mostly pressing [Shift]+[Enter] on a Jupyter Notebook. SystemML seemed cool, but the only thing we ever did with it was multiply some matrices, and not even on a Spark cluster. I felt like I didn't learn that much because there was no point where I really had to engage my brain.
By luca t•
May 17, 2020
Some lessons are too hard to follow because of stong foreign accents and poor grammar, so the student ends up spending most of their effotrs on tranlation. Instructors mostly go through coding notebooks quite quickly. The oil forcasting module is an example of the defects of the course: Poor language, poor presentation, 'here', 'there', 'now' are used to reference the code with no pointers, slides are borrowed from online sources and insufficient. The proposed code is a tentative time series forecating toy example with catastrophic results, not at par with any time series standard.
By Leonardo I•
Aug 28, 2019
The course is delivered at a very high level of abstraction. If you are a beginner, I wouldn't recommend this course as the explanations provided are quite vague and not so good in many instances. Justifications for the use of quite a couple of algorithms/values are not provided thus leaving the learner with a lot of "Why's"
One of the nice things about the course is that the instructor responds promptly to students' queries.
By Sheen D•
Sep 1, 2019
Again, the instructor speaks way too fast to explain anything. Even the subtitle cannot follow the instructor line by line. Frequent occurrence of inaudible words or sentence or wrong translations. When it comes to the code, never really understood what each line of codes is for...
By Hossein A•
Jun 17, 2020
Very good topic with not very good instructors. The exercises and programming assignments are too way easy and do not help in getting enough knowledge. All instructors are not native English speakers and have very strong accent and speak slowly.
By Quang A D•
May 25, 2020
It is difficult to fully understand the contents of the lesson, too many theories and not yet associated with practical problems. It's like studying in a university and for those who have more knowledge of math, not for everyone.
By Dr. J A V•
Feb 5, 2019
Explanations are a bit rush. Would not be easy to follow if I would not have deep previous understanding on the Deeep learning topics.
Apr 2, 2020
I felt the week 3 projects could have been given separate weeks to give better time for each project.
By John W•
Aug 31, 2020
The progress through the material was good, but the delivery was quite boring.
By Mayank B•
May 29, 2020
The assignments were not good enough to test what was taught.
By HAMM,CHRISTOPHER A•
Mar 24, 2020
No pedagogy. No instruction, mostly copy and paste and guess.