Chevron Left
Back to Introduction to Typography

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Introduction to Typography by California Institute of the Arts

4.8
stars
5,562 ratings

About the Course

Typography is the art of manipulating the visual form of language to enrich and control its meaning. It’s an essential area of skill and knowledge for graphic designers. Typography predates modern graphic design by around 500 years; it is rich in rules, conventions, and esoteric terminology—but it remains an exciting space for invention and expression. In this rigorous introductory course, we will study, name, and measure the characteristics of letterforms. We’ll consider the pragmatic concerns involved in selecting and combining type. We’ll peek into the 
rich historical, cultural, and aesthetic histories of familiar typefaces. We’ll discuss time-tested conventions and best practices in setting type, as governed by principles of hierarchy and spatial organization. And we’ll explore the expressive, meaning-making potential of type. Informative lectures will be complemented by a series of three peer-assessed assignments, culminating 
in an opportunity to design a full-scale typographic poster. Please note that this is not a software course; a basic working knowledge of Adobe InDesign or other 
page layout software will be assumed. You will need access to a computer and page layout software, such as InDesign, to complete the assignments....

Top reviews

BG

Aug 3, 2020

I thought the assignments worked really cohesively with one another. It helped to keep terms and skills in mind from one assignment to the next. The lecture videos were great, short, and to the point.

AS

Apr 12, 2021

This was an excellent course. I learned a whole lot about typography. The videos and assignments were interesting and challenging. I'm happy I was able to complete this course and highly recommend it!

Filter by:

1001 - 1025 of 1,203 Reviews for Introduction to Typography

By Dzigner T

•

Nov 8, 2017

goood

By Khabab M b

•

Jan 30, 2024

good

By مهند ا ا

•

Apr 6, 2023

good

By Abdul M A

•

Dec 19, 2022

GOOD

By shubham c

•

Jun 18, 2022

Nice

By Erick E H C

•

Nov 22, 2021

Nice

By Nixon M V

•

May 4, 2021

nice

By Mahesh N

•

Nov 1, 2020

GOOD

By Federico N

•

Jun 17, 2020

good

By Battina D G

•

Apr 29, 2020

GOOD

By 于楠楠

•

Apr 8, 2020

like

By cery m

•

Feb 11, 2020

good

By chise

•

Feb 9, 2020

good

By Mehrdad k

•

Jul 22, 2019

good

By Enas A M T

•

May 22, 2019

Good

By Medhat H M M

•

Jan 28, 2019

Nice

By Winnie W

•

Jun 30, 2017

good

By Jennifer K

•

Oct 4, 2022

me

By Huy T T

•

Oct 30, 2021

nc

By Abdel O G

•

May 20, 2022

k

By Anna R M

•

May 23, 2021

-

By Владимир К

•

Jul 25, 2016

G

By Millicent E

•

Jul 31, 2020

Great course! I learned so much about typography in a short amount of time. The history of typography wasn't something I thought I would be interested in, but in this course you'll see how much typography is influenced by its history. The examples -- and there are dozens -- are also amazing, I ended up screenshotting a lot of them so I can look back later.

The only thing I would change is that I wish the example images were downloadable, so I didn't have to pause-screenshot-unpause the videos every few seconds.

Overall, time and money well spent.

By Rama A

•

Aug 13, 2018

This course is very good. Gave me a whole new experience with Letters. Powerful lesson in Typography. After this course, I have started noticing the words and their styles in almost everywhere I see them and in every brand.

Cons: Since the assignments are graded by peers, you won't always get a grade you expect. Peers are also learning and sometimes they grade and review according to their own perceptions and knowledge. Some can be at least fair if not generous ;)

By Melissa O

•

Aug 17, 2017

It was nice to work with type and our own words. It felt like a more "concrete" change from the first course in this specialization where we only worked with shapes and lines. It would have been nice to have slightly more involved projects. It instead felt like we were packaging and repackaging the same copy for a month. I know that the intent was for us to focus on layout and placement, but after a while it felt state to be moving around the same content.