Chevron Left
Back to Agile Meets Design Thinking

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Agile Meets Design Thinking by University of Virginia

4.7
stars
2,933 ratings
846 reviews

About the Course

Despite everyone's good intentions, hard work and solid ideas, too many teams end up creating products that no one wants, no one can use, and no one buys. But it doesn't have to be this way. Agile and design thinking offer a different--and effective--approach to product development, one that results in valuable solutions to meaningful problems. In this course, you’ll learn how to determine what's valuable to a user early in the process--to frontload value--by focusing your team on testable narratives about the user and creating a strong shared perspective. This course is supported by the Batten Institute at UVA’s Darden School of Business. The Batten Institute’s mission is to improve the world through entrepreneurship and innovation: www.batteninstitute.org....

Top reviews

AA
Sep 8, 2020

I absolutely recommend this course for everyone who really wants to develop their skill or want to learn new skills. this amazing course will assist you to understand the user in a more strategic way.

TD
Oct 23, 2017

Rich and well-structured content about Agile and Design Thinking, shows how to approach and include personas that will somehow be touched by the solution being created, and deliver outcomes to them.

Filter by:

826 - 836 of 836 Reviews for Agile Meets Design Thinking

By Rawan R

Dec 9, 2018

I take effort to understand the and keep in track with the instructor, but it's a good content

By Suttirat H

Sep 4, 2020

the course for product management from Darden was so much better

By Roger K C J

Sep 16, 2020

There could be more content included and tested.

By Federico F C

Jun 23, 2020

just an introduction

By Harold J

Mar 7, 2016

Underway

By NGUESSAN A

Oct 4, 2020

no

By Colin E

Aug 4, 2020

The delivery is a little dry and there's clearly been some editing and rearranging of content. More than once, the instructor refers "back" to material that has not yet been presented. It's confusing and I ended up wasting time reviewing content because I thought I had missed it. Instead, it was just missing. or got a presenter much later in the course. There's a lot of repetition of concepts that seems pointless and the interviews don't really add to the understanding of the key points. The instructor also keeps referring to there being 5 courses in this specialty when there are 4.

By John P

Jul 17, 2020

Poor instruction methods. The faculty lacks teaching and pedagogical skills. Sorry

By Avraham H

Sep 15, 2020

too slow, assignments are irrelevant.

By PRAKRUTHI S

Jun 20, 2020

I need to unenroll the course

By Paulo M M

Jun 4, 2017

the evaluation is a shit.