Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

Arts and Humanities
Business
Computer Science
Data Science
Information Technology
Health
Math and Logic
Personal Development
Physical Science and Engineering
Social Sciences
Language Learning
Degrees
Certificates

Explore all of Coursera

Browse
Search
For Enterprise
Log In
Join for Free

2.6 Social Stratification

Loading...

Classical Sociological Theory

University of Amsterdam

4.8 (1,135 ratings) | 37K Students Enrolled

This Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) will offer the participants an introduction into the most important classical sociological readings between the 18th and 20th century. Highly influential social science scholars, such as Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim, will be discussed during 8 sessions. Combined with small tests, based on the video’s and recommended readings, the participants will be encouraged to dive deeply into the complex texts and get familiar with classical sociological concepts that are still very relevant today.

Reviews

4.8 (1,135 ratings)

5 stars
979 ratings
4 stars
135 ratings
3 stars
14 ratings
2 stars
4 ratings
1 star
3 ratings

EB

Feb 15, 2018

Great course, absolutely loved the teacher and his passion and how he explains difficult notions with so much ease. I would definitely recommend this course, it is a great first look into sociology.

KK

Aug 27, 2017

i began this class to review more of de Tocqueville and still have not had time to do so; however, i still prefer TocQ to all of these other thinkers. Wonderful experience... thank so much!!! <3

From the lesson

Session 2: Bernard Mandeville (1670-1733) and Adam Smith (1723-1790)

This session explains the work of Adam Smith. It shows you how a poem written by Bernard Mandeville inspired Adam Smith. Adam Smith's theory shines light on the consequences of industrialization. You will learn what the consequences are of the Division of Labour.

2.1 The Fable of the Bees7:26

2.2 The Invisible Hand6:24

2.3 The Division of Labour5:47

2.4 The Wealth of Nations6:18

2.5 Exchange and Self-interest5:29

2.6 Social Stratification6:19

2.7 The Importance of Adam Smith6:31

Taught By

Bart van Heerikhuizen
Dr.

Transcript

Interdependent human beings are exchanging things for other things, and

in that process, they tend to specialize.

They become experts in the production of one type of object that can be

exchanged against all those other objects that they need.

This is how the early forms of the division of labor began to develop.

In the course of time, this division of labor becomes more stabilized.

It conquers new territories.

In this connection, Adam Smith, almost in passing,

surprises the reader with a very interesting idea.

He says that in many cases the different talents that people exploit

in their different professions are not so

much the cause as the effect of the division of labour.

That he is referring to social stratification here, and

to social inequality becomes clear when he gives as an example,

the dissimilarity between on the one hand, the philosopher, and

on the other hand what he calls the common street porter.

He means the man who carries the luggage for travelers.

He wonders about how similar the two of them must have looked

when they were both young kids.

For the first six or eight years of their life he says they were very much alike.

Their parents or the friends they played with didn't notice much difference.

But then the division of labor began to do its differentiating work,

and one of them was sent to the university and became a professor and the other one

embarked upon a career that ended in carrying the luggage for other people.

And then, at the end of that process, Smith says the arrogant

professor does not acknowledge any resemblance anymore.

And that is an interesting thought coming from a professor,

Adam Smith, who was already during his lifetime very, very famous.

It seems as if he wants to say here,

if I was born in the cradle of that common street porter,

I might have ended as somebody carrying the bags of other people.

And had he been born in another place then he might have become

the university professor.

The division of labor is not the outcome of different talents of human beings,

it is in many cases the breeding ground for

different careers that lead to the development of different talents.

In older theories, social stratification is often explained by

pointing at the different talents that people possess.

And people say some are physically strong but not too clever,

and others are intellectually well-endowed, etc., etc.

And that is what explains the social distance between the different ranks

of society, to quote Adam Smith, the differences in power and in wealth.

But Adam Smith here goes in the opposite direction.

He says people are born into a society with a certain preexisting division

of labor and their social location in that stratified social universe

determines in many cases the talents that they will develop later on in life.

Smith goes even so far here as to say that human beings differ

less from one another than the different breeds of dogs.

To quote him again, by nature, the philosopher is not ingenious

in this position, also different from a street porter, as a mastiff,

that's a kind of dog, is from a greyhound, and a greyhound from a spaniel.

When my students read those lines, they are often surprised.

They thought that Adam Smith was this diehard liberal admired by many

conservative thinkers, and here he says that the man who is carrying the suitcases

for the famous professor was not so different from that professor after all.

Sometimes, one of my students says, but sir, this is so unfair.

Isn't it a terrible injustice that that street porter never could develop

his talents because, you know, he was born at the wrong side of the train tracks.

Whereas, the guy who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth is given

every opportunity, even if he happens to be not extremely talented.

Interesting point, but Adam Smith does not draw that conclusion.

There is no hint of indignation in this paragraph.

He just observes it as an interesting fact.

He doesn't suggest that this is a flaw that we should do something to remedy it.

And yet, the paragraph tells us a lot about the detached sociological scholar.

And also about this friendly man filled with sympathy, even empathy.

I can see him climbing out of his coach in Paris

walking behind the man who is carrying his suitcase.

As he looks at his back, he notices the holes in his coat and

he realizes that this man who seems to be of his age might have become a famous

professor in moral philosophy had he been born in a different social location.

Let's not forget, this is the second half of the 18th century.

The French Revolution is not so far away.

Explore our Catalog

Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play

Coursera
About
Leadership
Careers
Catalog
Certificates
MasterTrack™ Certificates
Degrees
For Enterprise
For Government

Community
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

Connect
Blog
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Tech Blog

More
Terms
Privacy
Help
Accessibility
Press
Contact
Directory
Affiliates