How do I pay employees? And how do I get paid? This course covers how to pay employees. We begin by asking: "What kind of a person do I need to attract, retain, and motivate for my business to succeed?" From here, we'll explain how to translate that pay strategy into the pay mix: the salary structure, short-term incentives, long-term incentives, and benefits that are aligned to your business objectives. Interested in learning more about the technical aspects of compensation, but don't know where to begin? We'll give an overview of key the key technical skills: compliance with pay regulations, understanding stock options, shopping for health insurance and pension providers, and designing incentive plans. Lastly, we'll discuss non-monetary methods of motivating employees. If you're interested in learning how to pay employees, or learning where your paycheck comes from, this course is for you!
2.1.3 Designing Performance Evaluations
Loading...
Skills You'll Learn
Human Resources (HR), Incentive, Compensation And Benefits
Reviews
4.7 (527 ratings)
- 5 stars393 ratings
- 4 stars106 ratings
- 3 stars17 ratings
- 2 stars5 ratings
- 1 star6 ratings
PV
Apr 10, 2017
This course has helped me to understand various aspects of compensation management it is a very great course and it provides very good insights about the topics related to compensation.
SD
Jul 24, 2016
An engaging introduction to employee compensation, both monetary and non-monetary. Very useful for participants from other HR backgrounds looking to fill gaps in their knowledge.
From the lesson
Pay for Performance
This module covers employee performance evaluations, raises and promotions, short-term incentives (like commissions), and long-term incentives (like stock options).
Taught By
Alan Benson
Assistant Professor
Mike Davis
Senior Lecturer
Welcome back.
In this video we're talking about designing performance evaluations.
So designing performance evaluations to do what?
First of all, we want to design evaluations that can develop employees,
get accurate data that can be used for things like compensation, promotions, and
so on, and also develop evaluations that avoid conflicts and avoid bias.
And how are we going to do that?
The two main steps are going to be good benchmarks and good communications.
And the first thing we're going to look at are benchmarking inputs.
When we're talking about benchmarking inputs,
we're talking about benchmarking employee behaviors.
And so for here we're going to introduce a new term.
This is a behaviorally-anchored rating scale, or BARS for short.
So BARS is a scale that maps behaviors onto a specific performance rating scale.
So let's see how that works.
So let's take an example of a BARS for customer service.
So here you'll notice that there are five different scores, a rating of 5,
4, 3, 2, or 1.
And each of those scores are tied, or
they're anchored, to a very specific set of behaviors.
That is, to get a rating of 5 on customer service, this is a person who
must discover, probe, and solve problems that customers don't even know about.
And to get a score of 1,
you would have to have little attempt to understand customer problems.
And so what are we doing here?
By tying each score to something that seems like something more of
an observable, objective behavior, we're trying to make it so it's more easy for
a manager to justify a score that corresponds to a certain behavior.
And also something that could be more objective and more comparable
across perhaps different managers who might have different biases or
might have different tendencies to rate people differently.
That is, regardless of where you are in the organization or
who's doing the ratings, you should expect that someone who's getting a 5
is also someone who solves problems that their customers might not even know about.
So when do we actually use these behaviorally-anchored rating scales?
We're typically talking about evaluating performance based on these
behavioral inputs.
If we know what employees should do to be successful,
we can actually measure what it is that employees do and
that usually involves jobs where employees have more supervision.
That is, to actually implement BARS, we'd have to have a manager who's actually in
a position to observe how that employee interacts with their customers.
Are they able to engage in kind of a problem-solving conversation?
Do they make efforts to learn about their customers' problems or so on?
And so some of these behaviors might be very difficult to
actually measure based on their outputs, because different clients could defer,
they might not collect data on the outputs, even though you can observe what
the behaviors those employees are doing, or so on.
And so again, if we can observe those behaviors,
then we might be thinking about benchmarking on inputs, that is,
using something like a behaviorally-anchored rating scale.
Next we'll talk about benchmarking on outputs.
When we're talking about benchmarking on outputs, we're not talking about trying to
measure what it is that employees are doing or their behaviors.
We're talking about measuring what it is that employees actually contribute,
what it is that they produce, what they output.
And one of the methods for this is a management by objective, and so
that's a method for benchmarking employees' ratings to their achievement of
prespecified goals.
And when we're talking about management by objectives, an example could be, again,
a 5-point rating scale.
So here, to get a rating of 4, the objective would be
to meet 100% of the new business target.
And to get the highest ratings,
you'd actually have to beat your target objective.
And at lower levels of meeting that new business target,
you would get a lower level.
And so how is this different from a behaviorally-anchored rating scale?
Well, you'll notice that, again, you're not measuring their behaviors,
not measuring what it is they try to do or
their effort or whatever they're trying to do to get new business.
You're only measuring whether an employee actually
achieves this outcome or this objective.
And so typically we're talking about measuring based on outputs,
or using a technique such as management by objectives,
if we know what employees should accomplish to be successful,
not what behaviors they should use in order to be successful.
We're also typically going to benchmark on outputs and
use techniques such as MBOs when we can measure what employees accomplished.
That is, for example, if we're talking about an airline flight attendant,
then it might be very easy to see that an employee's behaving courteously,
but we might not be actually measuring outputs such as customer satisfaction.
And in that case,
we'd want to use something like BARS as opposed to management by objective.
But if we're talking about a job such as salespeople who
would have a lot of autonomy, whose outcomes would be very
easy to measure even if we aren't necessarily directly supervising them.
Well, in this case, since we can measure those outputs,
we might be more likely to use a technique such as management by objective.
And so how do we design our MBOs?
Well, we can typically use the acronym SMART to help us design them.
That is, management by objectives, those objectives should be specific, measurable,
attainable, realistic, and time-bound.
So for example, when we said that to get the score of a 4 on our MBO,
we had to generate $10 million in new business,
that $10 million is a specific number, $10 million.
It's also measurable.
Presumably we can measure how much new business they bring in.
We want it to be attainable and realistic.
That is, it's not too much of a stretch goal.
Hopefully it won't be impossible for
an employee to generate $10 million in your business.
And then also you want it to be time-bound.
That is, that employee has perhaps one fiscal year,
beginning January 1st and ending at the end of that same year,
to actually obtain that $10 million in new business, and so it's time-bound.
And we don't necessarily think of BARS or
MBOs is being one or the other, or all or nothing.
Typically we'll have multiple ratings.
Some of them will be behaviorally-anchored and
some of them will more closely resemble measure by objectives.
And so for example, it might try to measure things like customer service or
teamwork or leadership or reliability as behaviors that we can observe and
that we might tie to the behaviorally-anchored rating scales.
And then separately we also might have a separate set of objectives for
them to pursue such as new business, business retention, and
quality measures that we'll have data for, these output data for.
And then, so we'll have a separate section of our performance evaluations for
those where the outputs are easily measured even if the inputs that
we know correspond to good outputs are not measuring.
The second set of best practices I want to discuss are regular communication.
And specifically, we want to specify to an employee the desired behaviors and
objectives in advance of when they're actually measured.
We also want to meet with our employees regularly and to explain scores.
Kind of the golden rule of performance evaluations is that they should not
be a surprise when the formal performance evaluation comes in.
That is, if the manager is communicating expectations and
communicating what behaviors or what objectives correspond to what scores,
then it's taking some of the subjectivity out of those ratings and
therefore making them more expectable and more predictable to employees.
And that also helps the manager have more of a learning conversation,
a more developmental conversation,
while still having these evaluations be used for judgmental purposes as well.
So for example, a manager could say something like,
I see that you scored a 2 out of 5 on this dimension.
Let's work together to see if we can figure out ways to
bring that score up in the future.
So in summary, tying performance evaluations to pay and
to promotions and to terminations and so on,
can harm the developmental purpose of those performance evaluations.
We also know from a lot of experience that raters will often try to
avoid conflict by giving very high evaluations.
And we can reduce bias and conflict by trying to benchmark our performance
measures and communicating them in advance of the formal evaluation themselves.
Explore our Catalog
Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.
Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education,
partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.
© 2019 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.
