9.2.1.2 The Islamic Revival in Egypt, Syria and Iraq - Part 2

Loading...

From the course by Tel Aviv University

The Emergence of the Modern Middle East - Part II

242 ratings

Tel Aviv University

The Emergence of the Modern Middle East - Part II

242 ratings

This course will discuss the developments in the Middle East from the early 20th century to the present. It will discuss the rise and retreat of Arab nationalism, the problems of internal cohesion of the Arab states, issues of religion and state, and the evolution of Islamist politics. It will also focus on the evolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict and its impact on the region and will conclude with an in depth analysis of the “Arab Spring” by placing these contemporary revolutionary events in their historical context. Please note that this course builds upon a previous course - The Emergence of the Modern Middle East - Part I Learn about the history of the Middle East for a deeper understanding of current regional developments!

From the lesson

WEEK 5

The Middle East from 1967 to the present including the Arab Spring

9.1.1 The Post-1967 Middle East: The Victory of State Interest - Part 110:02

9.1.2 The Post-1967 Middle East: The Victory of State Interest - Part 27:59

9.2 The Islamic Revival8:35

9.2.1.1 The Islamic Revival in Egypt, Syria and Iraq - Part 14:52

9.2.1.2 The Islamic Revival in Egypt, Syria and Iraq - Part 26:34

9.2.2 The Examples of Jordan, Algeria and the Palestinians8:04

9.3.1.1 The "Arab Spring": Modernity and Tradition - Part 15:22

9.3.1.2 The "Arab Spring": Modernity and Tradition - Part 211:30

9.3.2.1 The "Arab Spring": Egypt and Tunisia - Part 15:54

9.3.2.2 The "Arab Spring": Syria, Jordan, Yemen and Libya - Part 211:49

9.4.1 The Non-Arab Countries - The Republic of Turkey : From WWII to the Present11:42

9.4.2.1 The Non-Arab Countries - Iran: From the Pahlavi Dynasty to the Islamic Republic - Part 16:38

9.4.2.2 The Non-Arab Countries - Iran: From the Pahlavi Dynasty to the Islamic Republic - Part 26:45

9.5 Concluding Overview3:40

Meet the Instructors

Professor Asher Susser
Senior Research Fellow
Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies

In Syria, the religious factor in politics was

intimately related to the sectarian structure of Syrian society.

Just like in Iraq, Syria, under the Ba'ath Party,

had always been deeply influenced by sectarian politics.

And ever since the rise to power of the Ba'ath in 1963,

Alawi sectarian solidarity played an important role in regime stability.

A fact never openly admitted by the men in power, but a fact just the same.

Ba'thi secularism was a vehicle for

the sectarian domination of the Alawi minority.

The systematic marginalization of religion was a blessing for

the Alawis, whose heterodoxical faith was a political and social liability.

Therefore, from its inception in 1963, the Ba'thist regime was avowedly secular and

even radically so during the reign of the so-called Neo-Ba'th from 1966 to 1970.

But under Hafiz al-Asad who came to power in 1970, the Ba'th changed course.

After rising to the Presidency,

Asad sought to enhance the religious legitimacy of the Alawis.

In 1973, he reinstated the clause in the constitution requiring the head of

state to be a Muslim, a clause that the Neobathis had previously removed.

Asad also managed to get the leading Lebanese Shi'ite cleric, Moussa Sadr

to recognize the Alawis as orthodox Shi'is, and thus as ostensible Muslims,

constitutionally eligible for the presidency in Syria.

And from then onwards,

the link with the Shi'is in Lebanon has been particularly strong.

But many in the Sunni majority community of Syria here continue to regard

the Alawis as socially inferior heretics, whose political dominance was an anathema.

But after having crushed the Sunni opposition,

as expressed by the Muslim Brethren in 1982, President Asad adopted a more

conciliatory attitude towards the Muslim Brotherhood that was matched in the 1990s

by a greater measure of tolerance toward religion in general.

The process begun by of having the Alawis accepted the Shii's

was accelerated under Bashar, his son.

Bashar as President of Syria developed a more sustained program of

Shi'ization generally, with the help of the Iranians, as a means of legitimizing

both the Alawi community, and the regime in the eyes of the Sunni majority.

Hundreds of Alawis were sent to Iran for religious training.

While Iranian men of religion toured Syria to preach on Shi'ite religion

to the Alawite areas, as the regime sought to rid itself

of its former ultra secularist, anti-religious image.

The Syrian mass media diligently presented Asad to the Syrian public and

the world at large as a bona-fide Muslim.

Bashar like Kafirs before him, made a deliberate effort

to portray himself not only as a Muslim but as a devout one.

Furthermore, since the 1990's religious schools have opened all over the country.

Religious literature was readily available, and was sold

to the general public in far greater quantities than books on other subjects.

The number of students studying Sharia in the university was constantly on the rise,

and popular religious programs just like in other Arab countries

were broadcast on national television.

Syrian society, especially its Sunni components, was becoming more observant.

At least if judged for example, by participation in prayer or

the adoption of the Islamic dress code.

But all of the above failed to overcome the sectarian fault lines.

Many in the Sunni majority community continued to regard the Alawis

as socially inferior heretics whose political dominance was unbearable.

And when the Arab Spring erupted in Syria, it did not take long for

it to develop into an all out sectarian civil war.

Even in Iraq, under Saddam Hussein, the regime went through an Islamizing phase.

Shiite opposition to the essentially Sunni regime was always ruthlessly suppressed.

After Saddam Hussein's final rise to power in 1979,

along with his effort to forge an Iraqi sense of national consciousness drawing on

Iraq's supposed pre-Islamic Babylonian past, Saddam was not averse to exploiting

political Islam when he felt that such a shift might better serve his purpose.

Thus, while cracking down on Shiite political movements,

outlawing the Shiite opposition party Aldawa, and arresting and

executing Shi'ite leaders, the regime changed gears in its political language.

Saddam even began to claim direct descent from Ali bin Abi Talib,

revered by the Shi'ites as the rightful successor to the prophet.

The employment of Islamic themes for

regime legitimization increased consistently,

from a toeing of the Islamic line, for most of the war with Iran in 1980s,

to deliberate Islamic flag waving in the 1990s.

During the war with Shiite Iran, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi Shiites

fought shoulder to shoulder with their Sunni compatriots,

partly out of loyalty to the state of Iraq and to their own Iraqiness,

partly out of intimidation by the state's ruthless organs of suppression.

The war, however, also made it increasingly clear to the regime just how

effectively the Iranians had made religion into a mobilizing force, as opposed

to the weakness of Marthy ideology in emotionally mate, motivating Iraqis.

This further encouraged the process of Islamization,

which peaked on the eve of the Gulf War in early 1991,

when the words Allahu Akbar were embroidered on the Iraqi flag.

But these efforts were obviously artificial and got nowhere

in bridging the sectarian divide between the Sunnis and Shiites, in Iraq.

After Saddam's overthrow by the US in 2003, as we have already seen,

the country rapidly degenerated into sectarian strife, between Sunnis and

Shiites, which has yet to come to an end, over a decade later

Explore our Catalog

Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2018 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play