The last set of questions I want to address this week were the two that I posted. The first of which was, are network forms of organizing a means to non-profit success? And what I was trying to suggest was a lot of the readings seem to imply that. And you had a variety of answers and I just want to relay some of them because I thought they were very insightful. It's not clear to me that it needs to be a non-profit model in every case, it could be one for profit model as well. So I am just going to rattle off some. One of the strong no was from Paulo, it's not just reserved for small and poor firms. It's a way of operating for any firm. And Nargas, of course, gives a great example of how a huge school district used network organization to get together private contractors, so as to build quality schools in a timely manner. Another case of no, it's not just for small non-profits, was Equabay who's gave the example of free and open software kind of movement organizations that partner quite a bit. So and then on the other hand, you had these yeses which were yes, it's a non-profit, small organization kind of tool. And Lottie was a vehement yes, and she gives all sorts of helpful examples on United Kingdom kind of national parks, as well as the conservation volunteers, fair trade foundation. And Susan, too, mentioned yes, and speaks of she was on a board of a small non-profit that struggled for resources to provide mental health services. And it understood that persons in need of mental health services also required other services like housing, jobs and life skills. So, that non-profit eventually adopted a network of service provision model, and that worked for quite awhile. So Susan's example was actually a perfect one for network kinds of organizations. Shirley, of course again, had a great example of the National Service of Learning, SENA, in Colombia and even suggested video. Then there was a discussion about where doesn't it occur in non-profits. It's not always, it's not every non-profit that's suitable for this. So there's certain kind of non-profits that may be better for it. And particularly, I noticed that Donna had a lot of insights on this and she wrote about how low-tech non-profits, so like an art and religious non-profits, may not be really outfitted for this. Or even, she mentions how some non-profits are in niches that have lots of competition. There isn't enough carrying capacity for them, or even complimentary partners that they can choose among. So there's some cases where the context in which non-profits are located would make kind of a network form difficult. Other ideas that were related was, it's clear that we won't see non-profits, Heather was talking about that you won't see non-profits in vertically and horizontally integrated kind of customer service firms like Target and Walmart. So she had ideas of where you wouldn't see it for sure in profit sectors. And then some of you wrote at the very end, like Sam, about why non-profits in particular. And he said, he didn't think non-profits, small non-profits in particular, needed to compete per se. And so because of this it suggests that non-profits, if they lack competition, are more suited for this kind of network organization model. Now of course, it's not a panacea again. I mean, network forms of organizing are difficult to coordinate and managing is hard. As you saw the ideal manager is a little elusive. It's not something that's common sense to a lot of us. And you kind of have to look for shared interest. You have to constantly look for that and complimentary parts. And then some end gain that's had from the coordination that goes beyond any particular partnership. So I mean that's not always easy to accomplish and to sustain. So I think this question, we gain a lot of insight from your answers and hopefully I've helped add to that. And you've given a lot of great examples too. In fact, on the other question which was all about where have you applied network forms of organizing? These two questions are kind of related because you've gave lots of terrific examples. So it's not just in the readings now. We have lots of paragraphs where we can think of its application. But one in particular I wanted to mention on, and that was Sergei's notion of general contractors and how they do construction projects. And he argued that look, we do a network form of organizing every time we do a big job. And you have this general earth work, electrical kind of contractor who hires people like in masonry, roofing, plumbing, etc., as sub-contracts. And he even mentioned how larger projects require kind of joint ventures across multiple general contractors. And he explained how the projects were, or the network had a clear goal, a collective goal. And that each relationship was interdependent. So this was nice in terms of the collective getting a gain out of the network that was beyond any particular partnership. So the timely completion of one project between a subcontractor and the contractor affected the others, right? So all of them were interdependent, and this kind of setup was the network form of organizing, so that was a really neat example. And I thought Susan's, too, about the small board that she was on of a non-profit and health service industry. It was a really clean example in terms of the network forms of organizing and how that service is delivered. I'm sure there's many more that I could mention. I've tried to focus a little bit for the sake of time. So thank you for all your questions, and hopefully I've answered them with some insight. Next week, we have off here in the United States, it's Thanksgiving. And so Stanford actually doesn't hold courses, but it actually comes at a good time. I think we all need a little bit of breathing room to kind of collect ourselves for this final push. However, week nine videos will be up shortly, and you'll have two weeks to do the quizzes on those. And as always, I will look for you on the forum, and I'll be eager to see you when I return, thank you.