[MUSIC] So in this next topic, I'm going to present a problem and we're going to figure out whose problem it belongs to. Remember from Russel Ackhoff's teaching, that problems are seldom best resolved only at the point they appear. And the reason is because interconnecting essential parts affect one another. So here's a problem, a nurse is missing a dose at the time it's needed to be administered. So clearly that's a pharmacy problem because they're just working in it. No, no, actually, it's a financial problem because of inadequate funds for FT. No, actually, as I really think about it it's a nursing problem because they can't find the medicine because it had a brand name on it instead of generic. Actually, I think it's a facility problem, because no automated transport and poor design of the, no wait a minute. I'm pretty sure this is basically an IT problem because different databases for the nurse, the pharmacist. Well, wait a minute, I'm sure it's the physician's problem. They write poor and incomplete orders. It turns out that Russell Ackoff teaches that adjectives in front of the word, problem generally tell you nothing about the nature of the problem. They only tell you some thing about the bias of the person describing the problem. So while we may have many essential parts all playing a role in that area, instead of putting one of these adjectives like pharmacy, financial, nursing in front of the word problem. If you have to put some adjective in front of the word problem, put the word system problem.