Growing through Innovation

Loading...

From the course by University of Virginia

Business Growth Strategy

302 ratings

University of Virginia

Business Growth Strategy

302 ratings

Course 3 of 5 in the Specialization Business Strategy

Get the tools you need to analyze, evaluate and recommend specific actions organizations can take to grow their value and avoid common growth pitfalls. Learn to determine how best to build value, whether by scaling existing markets, entering established markets or creating new markets through innovation and acquisitions. Apply these concepts in case studies of industry leaders JetBlue, Starbucks, Intel Corporate Venturing and Tata Motors.

From the lesson

Growth through Innovation

Introducing new ideas, processes, and products that disrupt the market is another common growth strategy. In this module, we'll unlock the keys to innovation, from building an innovative capability to appropriating value from innovation to determining an innovation strategy. Using the Real Options Analysis tool, we'll show you how to grow through innovation and good practices for doing so. The Intel Corporate Venturing case provides an opportunity for you to practice this tool and apply course concepts to a real-world scenario.

Growing through Innovation7:15

Innovation Strategies3:26

Developing an Innovative Capability6:49

Keys to Innovation3:55

Organizing for Innovation6:47

Appropriating Value from Innovations2:01

Intellectual Property Protection7:08

Complementary Assets4:07

Determining an Innovation Strategy5:21

Module Lessons1:27

Meet the Instructors

Michael Lenox
Senior Associate Dean and Chief Strategy Officer
Darden School of Business
Jared Harris
Samuel L. Slover Research Chair in Business Administration
Darden School of Business

Welcome to growth strategies, module four, growth through innovation.

I'd like to begin with an innovation that probably many of you are familiar with,

Gorilla Glass.

Gorilla Glass was innovated by Corning.

It is a tough fracture resistant glass that is also somewhat flexible,

and has found wide use in a number of mobile electronic including the iPhone.

The story of Gorilla Glass actually goes back to the 1950's.

A Corning employee was researching a new type of glass and

accidentally heated it further than he had intended.

When he pulled back the glass out, he accidentally dropped it and

to his surprise it bounced.

This led to a series of investments in innovations that led to eventually

something called Chemcore.

A specific glass that they thought could be used

in number of applications such as for windshields for automobiles.

And throughout the 1960's,

Corning tried to sell this new glass that they had developed.

However, the market never really materialized, and by the 1970's,

they had abandoned this product.

Flash forward 35 years.

Steve Jobs is innovating a new personal digital assistant, a new smart phone.

And he comes to Wendell Weeks, who's the CEO of Corning,

to ask him if he had any products that would be a strong flexible glass.

Because Steve Jobs really would like to have a glass product verses a plastic

product for the new phones he's coming out with.

Well low and behold, sitting on the shelf they had this old technology that with

a little bit of investment and innovation eventually became Gorilla Glass.

I like to share this story because it highlights many of the challenges and

opportunities that innovation provides.

Here, we have an innovation that has been transformational, yet

it was 50 plus years in the making.

There's elements here of serendipity and luck, but there's also hard work and

invention and investment that was made as well.

Now, growth through innovation, is a topic that is aside many businesses.

It's hard to find an organization today who isn't looking for

ways to develop new products or services, new ways to create and deliver value.

Innovation is important not only to business, but

it's important to our broader economy.

Joseph Schumpeter, the famous economist, once commented that innovation,

not efficiency is the hallmark of market-based economies.

It's innovation that drives our economy forward.

He also coined that phrase, creative destruction, to talk about how innovation

disrupts the current competitive order and moves us forward.

From an individual business standpoint,

the suggested innovations is not only just an opportunity for growth, but

it's also an opportunity to perhaps avoid the creative destruction process.

Recognizing that existing positions just simply might not be sustainable in

the long run as innovation occurs.

Now, despite all the interest in innovation, innovation is difficult.

For many organizations, innovation is an R&D expense.

It's a large capital investment, and in fact,

billions of dollars are spent annually in R&D.

80% of which, is spent by large established firms.

R&D is hard to calculate its return on investment.

There's a number of reasons for this.

It's hard to predict the net present value going forward,

a priori when deciding whether to make an investment in R&D.

Part of the problem is that the minimum efficient scale, MES,

for R&D tends to be relatively moderate.

Why is this problematic?

Well, it's problematic because it's not just simply about spending more dollars.

With capital investments, like say, building a new plant and

the like, it could just simply be if you put more dollars into it,

you can achieve more outcomes.

Not so with R&D.

It's not clear just putting more money into R&D will lead to more innovation.

And this is because breakthrough products are often not mandated.

They arrive unannounced and

they often come from far afield maybe from where you originally intended.

Once again, look at Gorilla Glass story and where it originally began.

Because of the difficulty with innovation, people often ask,

well who's more likely to innovate?

There's great debates about entrepreneurs versus large incumbents.

This idea of two people in their garage, or two people in their

dorm room coming up with the next new thing is rampant in our society.

And we talk about those entrepreneurs.

But there are also examples where large incumbents are the ones most likely

to come up with innovations.

Joseph Schumpeter himself, early on in his career,

talked quite a bit about entrepreneurs and their potential for creative destruction.

But later in his career, especially in the wake of World War II,

talked about how there are certain industry sectors where one would expect

the large incumbents to be most likely to come up with large innovations.

Think about Corning, a venerable company in the glass industry, both commercial and

industrial usage.

They have resources and

expertise that they can exploit to come up with something like Gorilla Glass.

The gorilla glass story also highlights this tension between what we call

demand pull and technology push.

Demand pull is the idea that the market is demanding a certain good or service.

Technology push is the idea that technology itself is evolving.

And history is littered with examples where the technology pushes forward

before there is actually a market demand for a product or service.

Related to this idea is the tension between whether users innovate or

whether companies or producers innovate.

In lots of different sectors it's the users themselves who actually push

innovation along.

In the medical devices industry for example surgeons are often some of

the lead innovators in that sector as users of the technology.

Of course, there are other examples where the producers are the drivers of

innovation.

Apple's iPhone, one could argue, wasn't really driven by some explicit

customer demand for a product that looked and felt like the iPhone.

Rather, that came out of Apple's design studios and their engineers.

And then, only when it was revealed,

that we realized what a great opportunity this was.

Related to this is also the question of breadth versus depth of expertise.

At one depth level,

having rich technological expertise is often necessary to be able to innovate.

On the other side, we know from a lot of evidence and a lot of research,

that innovation often arises when you bring novel information together,

novel ideas, diversity of ideas together.

And as a result,

sometimes having breadth of expertise is more important than depth of expertise.

Another way of saying this is that we might think of explorers,

those who are out looking broadly for new ideas, versus exploiters,

those who are able to take their technical knowledge and apply it in a narrow domain.

This sometimes translates into organizations, where you see

some that organize themselves, what we might call skunk works.

Very ill formed, there's not strong rules, and procedures.

People are out there just kinda doing their thing.

Versus other organizations that are very rigid in their planning, and

how they approach innovation and R&D.

And we're gonna talk more about these different organizational structures and

when one might be favored versus another.

Again, this question of who innovates ultimately gets to this question of how

can you grow through innovation?

And what are some good practices that one might have for doing so?

Explore our Catalog

Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2018 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play