Monash Initiative: Long Patient Stays

Loading...

From the course by University of Virginia

Design Thinking for the Greater Good: Innovation in the Social Sector

46 ratings

University of Virginia

Design Thinking for the Greater Good: Innovation in the Social Sector

46 ratings

Do you work for a nonprofit or in the social sector? Are you struggling to solve the problems and meet the needs of the people you serve? Come learn more about how design thinking, a human-centered approach to problem solving, can help you truly understand an issue, generate ideas worth testing and iterate to find solutions that make a real difference. Through global stories from areas as diverse as government, health care, and education, we’ll show you the tools, techniques and mindset needed to use design thinking to uncover new and creative solutions in the social sector. The development of this course was supported by the Batten Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the University of Virginia's Darden School of Business. For more about the Batten Institute, see: http://www.darden.virginia.edu/batten-institute/ @BattenInstitute @DesignatDarden

From the lesson

ASKING "WHAT WOWS?" AND "WHAT WORKS?"

Welcome to our final week! This week we transition from idea generation to testing by examining the intersection of what stakeholders want and what the organization can sustainably offer. We'll consider the role of prototypes as a way to test our assumptions about a solution, and consider what it takes to launch a solution into practice, and see real-life examples of prototyping and testing in social sectors as diverse as healthcare and agriculture. You'll begin to think about your own social sector challenge you could tackle with design thinking. We end this week with some advice and actions for impact.

Whiteriver Part 1: First Assumptions5:45

Whiteriver Part 2: Reassessing Assumptions4:22

Intro to What Wows: Prototyping4:21

MasAgro: Creating a Space for Experimentation3:32

MasAgro's Hub System4:20

MasAgro's Innovation Network5:12

Intro to What Works3:50

Monash Learning Launch3:59

Monash Initiative: Long Patient Stays5:15

Integrating DT Across Monash Organization4:08

Meet the Instructors

Jeanne M. Liedtka
United Technologies Corporation Professor of Business Administration
Darden School of Business

In August 2014, Monash began to think more deeply about their extended stay patients.

Long stay patients represent only 2% of clients, but use 25% of hospital bed days.

So, minimizing long stay has significant value for any hospital system.

Since few people want to spend any time at all in the hospital,

it has clear value for patients as well.

Data, overall, illustrates that each additional day stay tends to have

less medical efficacy and it produces more stress in the patient and for the staff.

The Monash team began by drafting a four page

design brief to layout their objectives.

Though they had no idea what was causing the long stays, the hope was to

halve the number of people in Monash Hospitals staying longer than 21 days.

The team members immerse themselves in information about the experience of long

stay patients.

Conducting extensive interviews and

pouring over patient's real life descriptions of their needs.

It was face to face ethnography.

The team also spoke to frontline medical staff to understand the obstacles to

delivering care.

All these conversations lead to an intention

that the team elected to formalize.

The Long-Stay management system ensures that patients at high risk

to an extended stay receive appropriate, high-quality, safe and

waste free care in partnership between patients and caregivers.

Despite looking at all the data, one key insight was that each case was unlike

any other long stay case, patterns were difficult, maybe impossible to find.

Another insight was that patients loved being asked how they were.

That basic ethnography, that simple human connection,

helped both the patient's emotional and their physical states.

Busy clinicians needed an easy and intuitive way to track and

monitor patients with elevated long state potential.

Which the team arbitrarily decided was six days.

What could staff learn between that sixth day and between discharge.

Brainstorming led to a napkin pitch that resonated with awe.

An app that could be used with an iPad or other mobile device.

Something where front line caregivers could quickly and

easily record long-stay risk factors like infection or emotional states.

Besides predicting long-stay risk, the information could support doctor

patient decision making, and allow staff to track issues as they arose.

Because with an iPad in hand, staff was always mobile.

They could collect, record and examine all the data at each patient's bedside

while talking with him and his family.

The app titled, No Wasted Days, would also enable clinicians to request assistance

with patients stuck due to hospital processes or administrative foul ups.

And it will capture follow up conversations for

future research and iteration, except for development cost.

No wasted days, sounds like a win, win, win.

The team built wire frames to prototype the app and

began training nurses in using it, even though it was just a prototype.

To convey what the future under the new approach might look like,

they created a journey map that traced, day by day, the new and

improved experience of their persona Larry Longstay.

They iterated through four learning launches,

based heavily on clinicians feedback, improving the idea time and time again.

Once satisfied with the concept, they opened bidding for writing the app and

sought the $25,000 to get it developed.

Here's an interesting point, just preparing for the app, apparently

changed behavior, and, therefore, altered the hospitals bottom line.

When the Longstay project began,

Monash had 15 patients lingering longer than 21 days.

And when the app went out for

development, the hospital system was down to two, two patients.

Of course, there could be every reasons for the dramatic decline.

But some of it can be attributed to two concepts.

One, that just being the center of attention improves patient health,

not just patient experiences.

And the other is what researchers call the Hawthorne Effect.

That the focus required for any study affects the results and

usually in a positive way.

Humans, caregivers, in this case,

subconsciously think that if we're measuring, we should pay attention to it.

Developing the app idea, figuring out what information to collect, for

example, help caregivers pay attention to long stays and, most likely,

patients begin receiving more rather than less attention the longer they stayed.

Certainly, after the team's arbitrary six day threshold.

Explore our Catalog

Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2018 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play