Have a look at our trailer for a brief introduction to this course: https://youtu.be/GADAgxTHjgE In this course, you learn how the agro-food value chain approaches the challenge of constantly improving its competitiveness by producing high quality food and products and also aiming to attain greater sustainability. Some of the topics of this course are: • The notion of quality for food and agricultural products and consumer value. • How to conduct market research in this field. • Labelling, branding and pricing strategies, as-well as innovation in the agro-food sector. • How sustainability can be used as a competitive advantage through corporate social responsibility. • The role and different types of industrial standards. • The different forms of coordination in the chain, in particular with regard to the retailing and distribution sector. This course is taught by a group of international experts from Universities in Italy, Germany, Ireland, Scotland and the Netherlands. Each of them will give you insights into a specific topic related to food quality and the organization of the agro-food value chains.
Part 2: Definition of Corporate Social Responsibilities and the “Corporate Social Performance Model”
Loading...
From the course by Technische Universität München (TUM)
The Economics of Agro-Food Value Chains
70 ratings
From the lesson
Module 10: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Agro-Food Sector
In this module we will talk about “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Agro-food Sector and its Relevance for Food Companies”.
Meet the Instructors
Hannes LangResearch Associate
Technical University of Munich
Luisa MenapaceProfessor
Technical University of Munich
Faical AkaichiResearch Economist
Scotland’s Rural College
Francesco BimboResearch Economist
Wageningen University
Montserrat Costa-FontResearch Economist
Scotland’s Rural College
Carlo RussoAssociate Professor
University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale
Chenguang LiResearch Economist
University College Dublin
[MUSIC]
At first, a well defined framework to analyze firm
social responsibility behavior was proposed by Carl in 1979.
This framework to assess corporate social responsibility plan is known as
the corporate social performance model.
And it integrated the ideas and
the works about such topic elaborated until that time.
The scholar moved from the idea that business and
society are interwoven rather than [INAUDIBLE] entities.
Therefore, society has a certain expectation for
appropriate business behaviors and outcome.
Thus it first distinguished among the three distinct related phenomena.
The source of the expectation plays in all business because of
their rules as economic institutions.
And thus place it on a particular firms because of what they have
and what they do.
And then lastly,
the expectation placed on the manager as model actor within the firm.
Once these three levels of analysis are distinguished, institutional,
organizational, and individual level.
Then several formerly competing concepts can mix together to explain
the principles of corporate social responsibility that
are the pivotal elements of the corporate social performance model.
After analyzing principle of firm as this institution and
at a single element of firm, competitive environment as well
as individual that take decision on their behalf.
We can now move to analyze the process and
outcome of firm social responsible action.
Let's first analyze the level of principles by describing
the principle of legitimacy.
Such principle is related to the expectation that society places on
all business because of the rule of economic institution.
According to the principle of legitimacy, society grants legitimacy and
power to business as long as firms
use the power in a manner that society considers responsible.
Otherwise, not considering societies expectations
firms are pushed out of the market because the society
may withdraw the legitimacy for doing business.
This aspect of the framework described that both represents a generic code
conduct for firms to operating the market.
Indeed, firms works should be socially responsible because they exist.
And they operate in a shared environment with multi-impact on a broad variety of
stakeholders, considering governments, competitors, consumer, media.
Those groups may affect or
are affected by the achievement of an organization's purpose.
And in a different way, the grants and take away corporate legitimacy
if the firm can compensate for the losses of stakeholders' benefits.
Furthermore, model theories pointed out that Earth resource are finite,
and the populations are dependent upon another.
Therefore, firms decisions should
have been taken on moral grounds as well as rational economic grounds.
Not considering for
social principle in doing business deeply affect firm performance.
Please remember that the principle of legitimacy
apply to all business rather than a single firm.
The second principle we have to consider when we talk
about CSR is the principle of public responsibility.
According to it, business are responsible for outcomes related to their primary and
secondary area of involvement with society.
This principle apply at the firm level.
Indeed, firms are not responsible for solving all social problems.
Firms are responsible for problems that they have chosen.
And they are responsible for helping to solve problems and
social issues related to their business operation and interest.
By illustrating the principle of public responsibility,
we move from the generic expectation that society as all business to the specific
expectations that it has over a subgroup of firms which operate in a sector.
A classical example is that one of the outer producer company that is responsible
for helping to solve problems related to vehicle safety and air pollution.
Thus it may reasonably involved in driver education programs
as well as on public transportation policy.
Instead, it may be harder for an auto producer to justify their broad
involvement with social issues about low income houses or adult literacy.
However, businesses are so deeply interconnected with the society
that companies may indeed be able to justify their social involvements
that seems far away from the primary and secondary area of interest.
However, this principle leaves substantial room for
managerial discretion in that there are many tough socio problems and
issues irrelevant and how they should be addressed.
Contrary to the principle of legitimacy,
the principle of public responsibility applies at the firm level.
The last principle to consider in assessing firms
social action is the managerial discretion.
Such principal is related with the firm discretionary responsibility and
the area of voluntary social involvement.
The domain of discretionary responsibility
typically is known as a corporate philanthropy.
Or occasionally as corporate involvement in public private partnership or
collaborative social problem solving venture.
Company social responsibilities are not met by some abstract organizational actor.
They are met by individual such as manager who could soundly make decision and
choice on behalf of the firm.
Thus the principle of managerial discretion is based upon
the idea that managers can exist in an organization and
the society environment that is full of choice.
Thus managers actions have to jointly take into account corporate procedure or
more job definitions and available resource in technology.
Furthermore, managers are the moral actors on the job, and
thus it is their own choice how to fulfill and balance many of these responsibility.
Therefore, the principle of managerial discretion imply that because
managers possess discretion, they are personally responsible for.
And can avoid the responsibility to our society through reference of rule,
policy or procedure.
Then managers implement the corporate social principles
through process to obtain a social outcome.
In other words, corporation responds to the social
pressure through actions and process taken by managers.
Managers act according to the social and ethical principles and
are aligned with those of firms they belong to.
The process of corporate social responsiveness is the second step of
the corporate social performance model.
And should get attention from academic and
managerial thinking on how firms implement the principles illustrated before.
In order to implement effective process,
social responsible firm has to monitor and assess environmental conditions,
have to attend the many stakeholders demand placed on the firm.
And to design plans and policy to responding to the changing conditions.
First, responsive furtherance to societal pressure
survived by adapting to the environmental condition or
business condition as well as respond to them.
Environmental conditions include competitors, political and
legal boundaries as well as technological constraint.
The level of knowledge which a firm has on its environment
could be used to devise strategy for adapting to it.
And to design corporate social responsible plan that best fit
to the environmental situation.
Second, social responsive firms typically connect with external stakeholder that may
generate some advantages in translating corporate social principle into practice.
Some example of strategic partnerships are those with the local communities,
NGO or local activist.
Such partnership are created by using instrument such as community
based programs or relationship with public offices.
The firms aim is to create social plans and
share it with the largest number of entities involved in social issues.
Third, issues management is the last facet of process of corporate responsiveness.
Such facet of corporate social responsiveness model involve devising and
monitoring internal and external processes.
The main purpose is to minimize reprise connected with the development and
handling the social issues.
Then, the outcome of firms behaving in
a socially responsible way are of direct and obvious interest for
researchers in assessment of corporate social responsible plan.
Firms outcome, social impact and policy are part of the corporate
social performance model which is observable and open to assessment.
Such visible outcome of corporate social responsibility plan
embedded corporate principle and those individuals who implement them
through process which may involve that awesome multiple stakeholders.
Thus, by evaluating the outcomes,
researchers are able to assess the entire social behavior of the firm.
With this slide, we conclude the first lesson of module ten,
definition of corporate social responsibility.
And thanks for being with me in this lesson.
See you in the lesson one,
corporate social responsibility in the agrofood sectors of module ten.
Thanks.
Explore our Catalog
Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.
Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education,
partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.
© 2019 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.
