Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

Browse
Search
For Enterprise
Log In
Join for Free

Social Conservatives

Loading...

US Social Services Compared

Columbia University

4.7 (24 ratings) | 728 Students Enrolled

Course 1 of 5 in the Social Policy for Social Services & Health Practitioners Specialization

In all nations, social policy is a very large public investment. Course 1 will explore the size, structure, and outcomes of U.S. social policy and compare this policy to those of similar developed countries. The course will also probe the values this policy represents and the values debate regarding about how big our welfare state should be— in other words, how much of our education, housing, health, income support, and social services the government should supply and how much individuals should supply for themselves. This course addresses issues of power, oppression, and white supremacy. The course is part of a sequence in social policy that has an HONORS TRACK. This track will prepare the learner for masters-level work in policy, which involves reading the literature, writing concise summaries and probing critiques. Over the sequence the learner will develop a policy analysis that will create a foundation for professional policy analyst assignments.

Skills You'll Learn

- Distinguish the values inherent in each social policy initiative, - Critique components of a social policy based on their effectiveness at meeting the goals stated in the initiative, - Develop social welfare policy analysis and reform proposals, - Differentiate alternative approaches to social policy problems, - Formulate practice strategies to overcome the historic biases in social welfare programs

Reviews

4.7 (24 ratings)

5 stars
17 ratings
4 stars
7 ratings

RC

Jun 29, 2019

Exceptional topics and Positive take-aways for our nations Welfare State

PP

Jun 15, 2019

Excellent course about the US welfare state in comparison with others.

From the lesson

Does the Welfare State Enrich Us of Impoverish Us?

In this module, we will explain the size, structure and outcomes of US social policy when compared with comparable developed nations and to differentiate the conservative approaches to social welfare

Politics and Policy3:30

Size of the Welfare State5:34

The Structure of the Welfare State9:20

Floors, Platforms and Safety Nets3:50

Fragile Families by Professor Garfinkel6:42

Wealth & the Welfare State by Professor Garfinkel6:50

Economic Conservatives5:10

Social Conservatives4:53

Liberalism & Social Democrats9:29

Taught By

John Robertson
Policy Lecturer

Transcript

In the last video lecture we explored economic conservative view. And you'll often hear in discussions of politics in the United States the distinction made between economic conservatives. That is conservatives who think that protecting and sustaining markets are central to making us a wealthy and efficient state and creating the maximum well-being to all of us. There's another point of view here which is sometimes in conflict with economic conservatives, and those are social conservatives. And social conservatives hold that we have a way of life, a way of life that has been revealed to us. Revealed to us by the structure of the planet itself given to us by God. That there's a central importance of the family. A central importance of commitment to the children that you raise, and it's valid to look after my family and my people first. And that we build up communities of endeavor, communities of connection, communities of blood. They would talk about traditional values like fidelity, thrift, temperance, discipline, responsibility. It's not that others in America wouldn't talk about these values, but they would see these values tempered by other concerns, like need or equality or freedom of expression. Whereas from a social conservative point of view, these are God given responsibilities. And a strong concern for the responsibility and the initiative of the individual. That people have to take responsibility for their own lives and work out well in that way. So, as a result, they believe strongly in small government, non interference. Not interfering with government to allow families and communities to build their way of life. Limited taxation, limited regulation. That religious institutions are central to the building of a healthy society and that they need to be protected and supported. And they need to play an active role in the shaping of a society. The social conservative view is largely that charity is a divine responsibility given to us by God. It should be left to the private sector that government does not do a good job in distributing wealth. And that when it is left to the charity, it is done in and in a way that is more satisfying, more adequate. And keeps in place the appropriate relationships between people. It should be voluntary and not forced through taxation. And taxation is viewed by some as simply the confiscation of what is mine, the confiscation of private property. So giving alms is the responsibility of all citizens, providing for those in need. And whether you're talking about a Christian, a Jewish, a Muslim, a Hindu, a Buddhist, a religious perspective. This notion of supporting those in need is deeply a part of ones response to God. So public transfers to the poor, therefore, government transfers to the poor are only really appropriate if they're temporary so that people can get back to their self-reliance. If they encourage self-sufficiency. If they help people get on their feet and move ahead. And if someone does not have the capacity to work. And has no role in creating that problem, then we can think about long term support. But, if they have capacity for work or if the reason that they're not working is of their own creation, then that person needs to take responsibility for their own world and move ahead. So otherwise we should provide in institutional settings that is not particularly desirable, will give people what they need in homeless shelters, in charitable works. But that the responsibility falls to the individual to look after themselves, and to take action. So this push and pull between the role of the market and the role of the individual, that is very strongly held by the social and economic conservatives. Plays a significant role in the way in which social welfare has been and is being developed in the United States.

Explore our Catalog

Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

Get it on Google Play

Coursera
About
Leadership
Careers
Catalog
Certificates
MasterTrack™ Certificates
Degrees
For Enterprise
For Government
For Campus

Community
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

Connect
Blog
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Tech Blog

More
Terms
Privacy
Help
Accessibility
Press
Contact
Directory
Affiliates