The Apology Formula

Loading...

From the course by University of Pennsylvania

Improving Communication Skills

621 ratings

University of Pennsylvania

Improving Communication Skills

621 ratings

Course 2 of 4 in the Specialization Achieving Personal and Professional Success

Learn how to communicate more effectively at work and achieve your goals. Taught by award-winning Wharton professor and best-selling author Maurice Schweitzer, Improving Communications Skills is an essential course designed to give you both the tools you need to improve your communication skills, and the most successful strategies for using them to your advantage. You'll learn how to discover if someone is lying (and how to react if they are), how to develop trust, the best method of communication for negotiation, and how to apologize. You'll also learn when to cooperate and when to compete, how to create persuasive messages, ask thoughtful questions, engage in active listening, and choose the right medium (face-to-face conversation, video conference, phone call, or email) for your messages. By the end of the course, you'll be able to understand what others want, respond strategically to their wants and needs, craft convincing and clear messages, and develop the critical communication skills you need to get ahead in business and in life.

From the lesson

Deception

In this module, you’ll learn what deception is, how to detect it, and what to do once you know it's taken place. You'll examine the most common cues that indicate deception and explore practical steps to take when you discover deception. You'll also be able to evaluate deceptions and transgressions to determine whether they are core or non-core violations. Finally, you'll analyze the components of successful apologies, so you can create your own, if necessary. By the conclusion of this module, you'll be able to better detect deception, and devise an appropriate reaction that will help you achieve your objectives.

Fundamental Truths about Deception7:19

The Challenge of Lie Detection4:35

Cues to Detect Deception9:22

Matching the Content and Context9:18

Practical Steps8:14

Nature of Violations8:52

Learning from Bad Apologies7:15

The Apology Formula6:00

Preparing the Apology5:28

Meet the Instructors

Maurice Schweitzer
Professor of Operations, Information and Decisions
The Wharton School

Let's put these pieces together and think about what the apology formula should be.

I'll start with a study, this is a study that was done with German eBay users.

Here, 632 customers had posted some negative feedback.

And as most of you know negative feedback on an online system's pretty bad.

And these customers were contacted and asked to remove that negative feedback.

Now half of them received an apology.

The apology read, I would like to apologize and

ask whether you might withdraw your evaluation.

And 45% removed that critical rating.

The other half didn't receive that apology but they received a cash rebate.

And they were offered this as a goodwill gesture.

And then asked if they would withdraw their evaluation.

And here only 21% did.

What's funny is from an economics perspective, we think,

well, isn't money better than an apology?

But it turns out, asking for that removal works better with an apology.

People, sometimes, all they really want is an apology.

Okay, so what we learn from this is that money might help but

an apology is sometimes even more effective.

I want to think about another case that was incredibly powerful.

Here, Southwest Airlines, their first fatal accident.

This involved a crash at Midway.

It was icy.

The airplane, as it landed, tore through the runway.

There was a gate.

It blew past the gate and into an intersection, striking cars below.

And, here in this first fatal accident, the Southwest CEO Gary Kelly apologized.

And he apologized effectively and swiftly.

And it was unusual at the time for the CEO to deliver this apology.

So here he comes out, and his response is quick, within hours.

He expresses condolences, he flies with his Go Team,

94 Go Team employees fly with him to Chicago.

And he comes out with his heartfelt apology.

There are no words to adequately convey our grief and sorrow.

Now, his response was characterized in the media as swift and caring.

And by all measures seemed to be incredibly effective.

What I want is I want to think about the lesson here,

that is, who apologizes matters.

We talked before about the VW case.

Here it's the CEO, the leader, that's apologizing.

And speed matters.

I mentioned before Kaelyn Sosa.

Now what I want to suggest is that here it was this

Nurse that first noticed the problem.

And what happened with Kaelyn Sosa,

as she had this breathing tube that became dislodged she ended up losing oxygen.

And what the apology was able to do in this case

was repair that relationship completely.

Now, why?

Because it was swift, it was complete.

And what's really interesting about this case

is that the apology plan was instituted at the institutional level.

That is the organization had made a commitment.

They had a check list of what people should do if there's a failure.

People should quickly apologize.

Be candid about the entire procedure failure.

Reach out.

Get to know the family.

And that's what they did.

And as they changed procedures, Ozzie Sosa actually came back and

said, I'm impressed by the changes.

And they ended up making safety videos for the hospital, they never sued,

they mediated a settlement with the Sosa family.

So, here's what a good apology can do.

It can fundamentally change perceptions.

Words matter.

And as we saw with the eBay study words are surprisingly effective.

But then the deeds matter too.

So, like at Baptist Hospital, changing procedures.

Now, here's what Baptist did.

They had a full disclosure.

They explained what happened.

They immediately came to the family to deliver a full accounting.

They mediated a settlement that included free physical therapy for life.

They created a video with the families.

And when Ozzie Sosa, the father,

came back to witness all the changes, he said, I completely forgive the hospital.

So what makes an apology effective?

I want to distill three key ideas.

The first is candor.

So we want full disclosure, that's what Baptist did.

It's the opposite of what VW did.

We want a speedy apology.

So Southwest quickly apologizes.

Coca-Cola is sort of waiting for things to blow over.

The second key idea is remorse.

Who apologizes helps convey that remorse.

So is it the CEO or somebody less authoritative?

We want to see an expression of regret.

Southwest Airlines does this, Lululemon doesn't.

Is it other-focus?

That is, are we focused on the person who's been harmed?

Again, Southwest Airlines does a beautiful job at that.

British Petroleum wrestles with that.

And penance, who's paying for something?

So Baptist Hospital's paying for lifelong care.

Tiger Woods doesn't seem like he's suffering very much.

So that's remorse.

And the third piece is a commitment to change.

We hear that Baptist Hospital committed to change.

They enacted changes.

VW has yet to do that.

Explore our Catalog

Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play