Explore
For Enterprise
Join for Free
Log In

Arts and Humanities
Business
Computer Science
Data Science
Information Technology
Health
Math and Logic
Personal Development
Physical Science and Engineering
Social Sciences
Language Learning
Degrees
Certificates

Explore all of Coursera

Browse
Search
For Enterprise
Log In
Join for Free

Unwanted Pregnancy, Contraception, and Abortion

Loading...

International Women's Health and Human Rights

Stanford University

4.9 (321 ratings) | 17K Students Enrolled

This course focuses on women’s health and human rights issues from infancy through old age, including information about positive interventions relating to those issues. Learners are encouraged to interact with each other through interactive discussions. It is important to us that this course be available to all learners. We encourage you to apply for Coursera's financial aid (see link to left) if the cost of the course certificate is difficult for you to afford. Please note that you may view all materials in this course, and participate in it, without purchasing a certificate. The course was co-created by Consulting Professor Anne Firth Murray and Kevin Hsu. Anne Firth Murray is the Content Director of the course; Kevin Hsu is the Design Director of the course.

Skills You'll Learn

Health Education, Reproductive Health, Community Health, Sexually Transmitted Infections

Reviews

4.9 (321 ratings)

5 stars
290 ratings
4 stars
23 ratings
3 stars
4 ratings
2 stars
3 ratings
1 star
1 ratings

JK

Apr 01, 2019

Excellent course! Would recommend it to anyone wanting to learn more about the challenges women face and what local communities around the world are doing to change their situation for the better.

RA

Aug 21, 2017

It was very informative and interesting. The layout was clear and easy to use. the interviews in particular were useful and interesting. I would definitely recommend this course.

From the lesson

Reproductive Health

Unwanted Pregnancy, Contraception, and Abortion25:44

Taught By

Anne Firth Murray

Transcript

Being pregnant when you want to be can be a wonderful experience.

Being pregnant when you have been raped or coerced into sex or unready or

unable to care for a child is one of the worst and

most dangerous experiences a woman can have.

Women in these circumstances feel so strongly about not wanting to be pregnant,

that they will take extreme measures to avoid it,

often risking their lives and health.

Women will not have control over their health and their destinies, and

maternal mortality rates in poorer countries will remain high until universal

access to inexpensive safe abortion is available around the globe.

Abortion is sometimes avoided as an issue because of its controversial nature and

because the debate so rarely changes people's minds on the subject.

But access to safe, legal, and affordable termination is vital for

several reasons that are discussed on pages 112 to 118 of the text.

We also have a video of Caitlin Gerdts, an epidemiologist and

expert on reproductive health, speaking about these issues.

>> Was it your interest in inequality that led you to focus, as you have?

>> Yeah. >> And let's here more about that focus.

>> That's a great question.

So as I said, I think that what has brought

me to the field of reproductive health

has indeed been issues of inequality,

both in our own country, but

globally has always been more of my focus.

And again, because I study contraception,

and specifically abortion, thinking about inequality and

inequality in access to services and

access to rights is a big question around the world.

And it varies from country to country what the issues of inequality are.

But I think that as someone who has been committed to women's rights and

reproductive rights, thinking about the choices that women are making and

the choices that women have in various limited or

more expansive contexts has always been of interest to me.

>> Could you give us an example, a very specific example,

perhaps from Ecuador or other, wherever you may have traveled or lived.

>> So after I left Stanford, I spent some time in the Peace Corps in Ecuador.

And much of my work there focused on education around family planning.

And something that I saw very commonly among women

in the community that I was living in was an interaction

between gender-based violence and access to family planning.

And it took me quite some time to understand this interaction and

where it was coming from.

But the patriarchal establishment in

the country where I was living certainly

condoned gender-based violence as a norm,

as something that women were expected to tolerate.

But that experience for women was so disempowering and

was so, I think, harmful to their own image of themselves and

their own ability to control their lives broadly

that their interest in or information about or

access to information about family planning was in turn very limited.

Whether it was because they themselves didn't recognize their own ability

to go and seek information or simply because their partners would forbid it.

And thinking about the way that these women were

living their lives, just talking with them and

presenting them all of the options in terms of

family planning was a fascinating conversation.

Most women in the community I was living in were having four or five kids.

But if you asked them how many kids they would like to have, they would say two or

three, which means they're having two or

three more children than they ideally would want.

And there certainly were some interesting interactions with religion

that I encountered while I was in Ecuador.

But I did find even the Catholic priests in the community were

relatively open to women using modern methods of family planning.

But one thing that I kept encountering over and over was that

despite the fact that women wanted to be able to control their own fertility and

might even know about some of the methods of contraception.

They weren't willing to go to the one place where they could have

gotten it in their community, which was the health center and

surmounting those kinds of hurdles.

And thinking about the fact that this was,

it's certainly the only place they could go in their own town.

And if they wanted to go somewhere else, it would be 45 minutes to one hour and

a half walk to get to a different health center in a different town.

But women don't have that kind of time freely, and

they would often have to justify it to a partner or to

other members of the community if they saw them walking in one direction.

And thinking about how to increase women's ability

to access these services without putting themselves

at jeopardy certainly peaked my interest and

Brought me even closer and made me want to study these issues even more

Another example that I could give is

access to abortion services in Ethiopia.

Similarly, gender norms and

centuries of patriarchy leaves women

faced with similarly difficult choices in Ethiopia.

There's a fascinating program in one region of the country where traditional

birth attendants have been trained to give women Depo Provera injections.

Which is a very covert method of birth control, and

it's something that women don't even have to leave their house.

To receive in a visit from a traditional birth attendant is a very common

occurrence.

So, it's not particularly suspicious.

So, I think that kind of methodology is certainly interesting.

Depending on the trust that the woman has with her birth attendant.

But despite the fact the contraception is

perhaps even more readily available in Ethiopia then it was in Ecuador,

in 2005, the Ethiopian parliament

changed the criminal code to make abortion

more legal on broader grounds in Ethiopia.

And a big driver for the legal change was

a discrepancy, a real inequality, in the maternal mortality ratio

for young women, for women under the age of 18.

And much testimony was offered by

obstetricians and gynecologists, by the society of midwives,

by a group of female lawyers, that was incredibly compelling.

Suggesting that much of the maternal mortality in younger woman in

Ethiopia was being driven by unsafe abortion.

And the millennium development goals that

the United Nations established in the year 2000, despite many of their shortcomings,

have certainly encouraged governments around the world to

attempt to reach their targets.

One of the targets of the millennium development goals is to reduce maternal

mortality from 1990 levels by three-quarters.

That's a challenging goal and very few countries, indeed, are on track.

But Ethiopia are one of the five

largest contributors to maternal mortality on the planet.

And they were a long way off.

And when the parliament saw this compelling evidence suggesting that so

much of maternal mortality was being driven by complications from unsafe

abortion, there was a real sea change in

terms of attitudes about abortion and legalization.

So now in Ethiopia,

if you're under the age of 18, you can get an abortion on demand.

There are also broad provisions for

health exceptions.

When the life, or health of a woman is in danger.

There are mental health exceptions.

There's an exception for rape, and incest.

All things which were not permissible before 2005.

And while Ethiopia now

has one of the most liberal laws on the African continent, and

abortion is readily available in the capital city,

the law has not, there has not been

a concerted effort by the Ethiopian government to roll it out and

to actually implement the law equally throughout the country.

So still, especially in some of the poorest,

most rural districts of Ethiopia, women are facing access problems.

Abortion is for all intents and purposes legal,

but women in many parts of the country are unaware of the law.

There has been no real public education campaign.

And clinicians, obstetricians and

gynecologists are few and far between in that country.

And registered nurses, and midwives,

and even lower level health

providers have in some parts of the country been trained to provide abortion.

But for most of the country,

there is simply no one who can safely provide abortions.

And as we know, women who experience an unwanted pregnancy,

whether in marriage, out of marriage,

accidental or no for whatever reason,

if the pregnancy is unwanted, we know that women will terminate that pregnancy.

And the only difference that a law makes is

that those terminations will either be safe or they'll be unsafe.

And the maternal mortality and we were seeing in Ethiopia pre

2005 driven by unsafe abortion,

is certainly women who need this service and

need access to safe method of termination and simply don't have it.

And if the law has changed, but has essentially not been implemented,

the actual change in maternal mortality is going to be negligible.

>> We don't have too much time left, but I would like you to speak

a little bit about how can we get into it?

Well the choice you made in your career.

You could've gone in medicine, I mean you took a public health degree,

you ended up being an epidemiologist.

And I'm interested and people might be interested, as to know by going that

route, what specifically are you actually working on now?

But I also think people would be interested in some

commentary that, as you were speaking about Ethiopia,

is very reminiscent of the United States where we have

the law that allows access to abortion but access is the problem.

>> Yeah.

>> And I wonder if you could make some commentary about that.

>> To bring it back, not that this course is about the United States necessarily.

But a general point that I'll probably make at some point is that I think there

are about three issues that really unite women across borders, this is one of them.

Reproductive freedom, access.

And another is violence and I think the third is access to the paid economy.

But in this case, I think it unites women.

And so I'm wondering if you could comment on the United States,

the situation particularly having to do with access.

And then a little bit about maybe even taking

up the issue of people who are uncomfortable with the idea of abortion.

>> Yeah, okay.

So, let me go back, I guess to where I said that

issues of inequality are what brought me to this field.

And it is certainly true that there

are many issues of inequality that one could focus on.

And I think there are many elements of reproductive health

that are less controversial.

We see, in fact, that the Gates Foundation, which is largely driven by

Melinda Gates who is a Catholic is finally, after many, many years, investing

enormous amount of money in contraception

with the ultimate goal of reducing unmet need.

But they are also making the claim that by providing women with access

to contraception, they will inevitably reduce maternal mortality.

And my take on that is that it's fabulous.

That we should certainly provide women who want it with access to every form of

contraception that is available on the market.

Every woman should have that choice.

But even if we reduced unmet need for

contraception completely, we would still have 14 million abortions every year.

That's because not all contraception is perfect.

That's because women are not always empowered to

be able to get their partners to use effective methods of contraception.

Rape and incest still happens, accidents happen.

We would still have a great need for safe abortion services all over the world.

And in order the address the issue of maternal mortality,

ignoring abortion is a non-starter.

We can't do it.

Unsafe abortion kills tens of thousands of women every year.

We don't have good enough data on it,

partly because women are terrified to talk about it.

And I think in terms of the career choice that I made, and

the decision to study a field that federal government is loathe to fund,

[LAUGH] that the Gates Foundation will never touch, has as much to do with

inequality and access to services as it does with the treatment that abortion

gets in general discourse, both in the United States and globally.

And I think this is where reproductive health and human rights

intersect in a deeply intimate way.

We talk so much about choice and that has certainly

been the common rhetoric in the United States.

But I think that we often forget that women

have a right to control their fertility.

Women have a right to make decisions for themselves about what is right for

their lives and for their families.

And when you ask women why they are seeking abortions, in the United States,

more than half of women who have abortions already have children.

That's true all over the world.

And women are making decisions not to have another child often for

the well-being of the families that they already have.

Because they simply don't have the resources or the ability to care for

another child.

These are not selfish choices.

These are choices that women are making for their lives and for

the lives that the people that they love.

And that is every woman's right.

And it concerns me a bit that we focus so

much internationally on unsafe abortion and on the health consequences of women

not having access to safe abortion services, when I think the conversation

should also very much be about what happens when women don't have the right

to make the choices that they know are good and right for their lives.

It's interesting, as someone who has focused primarily on global

abortion issues, I often present a pie chart

that shows the proportion of the world's population that lives in countries where

abortion is restricted for a variety of different reasons.

There are a handful of countries where abortion is completely illegal for

no reason.

Even to save a mother's life, would abortion be committed.

Very few countries.

Then there is another chunk of countries where abortion is permitted,

only to save a woman's life, then for health reasons, then for

mental health reasons, then more broadly expanded to socioeconomic reasons.

And then there's about 40% of the world's population

who live in countries where abortion is quote, unquote unrestricted.

But in that 40% falls the United States of America.

And we know very well that while, up until now,

a woman has not had to state a reason for

seeking abortion, there is a gestational

age limit that has been established by

the decision Planned Parenthood versus Casey,

which essentially says that viability is

the line up until which a women can receive an abortion.

Now, most doctors, most obstetricians and gynecologists interpret that

as 24 weeks but that is entirely up to the medical establishment.

There are other exceptions for

which women can get abortions later on in their pregnancies for

fetal anomalies and for health and life exceptions in some places.

But even in states where 24 weeks is the viability

interpretation, as we have seen over the last decade,

more and more states are restricting access to

abortion using a myriad of techniques.

Whether it's restricting doctors

from performing abortions unless they have admitting privileges to hospitals.

Whether it's regulations on abortion facilities.

Waiting periods.

We have [COUGH] anything from a 24 to a 72-hour waiting period in Utah.

And the rhetoric from the lawmakers and the advocates who are pushing for

these restrictions is that they only want to make abortion safer.

But we have incredibly compelling evidence that,

at any stage in pregnancy, abortion is far safer than childbirth.

Across the board in the United States, it doesnt matter when.

And we also know that women who are forced to wait

24 hours, 36 hours, up to 72 hours.

That means,

if you've had a difficult time getting to an abortion clinic the first time, and

then you're told you have to wait another three days, that means finding child care.

That means figuring out somewhere to stay.

That means transportation costs.

This is not about safety.

This is about putting an undue burden on women.

A burden that is so

heavy that they will be unable to get the abortion that they're seeking.

This really is about restricting women's access and

restricting women's right to an abortion.

And we've seen that play out over and over again in states

that try to pass gestational limits that are lower,

that try to pass waiting periods and track laws.

And I do think that access issues in the United States,

despite the fact that it falls in that category of without

restriction, are becoming more and more real.

I haven't at all talked about the fact that medication abortion and Misoprostol,

which is a safe medication that can safely terminate a woman's pregnancy,

has dramatically reduced maternal mortality all over the world.

And I think, as we see access being restricted in the United States,

we will see more and more women using Misoprostol to terminate their

own pregnancies, safely, and outside the medical system.

>> Thanks so much, Caitlin.

Explore our Catalog

Join for free and get personalized recommendations, updates and offers.

Coursera provides universal access to the world’s best education, partnering with top universities and organizations to offer courses online.

© 2019 Coursera Inc. All rights reserved.

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play

Coursera
About
Leadership
Careers
Catalog
Certificates
MasterTrack™ Certificates
Degrees
For Enterprise
For Government

Community
Learners
Partners
Developers
Beta Testers
Translators

Connect
Blog
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube
Tech Blog

More
Terms
Privacy
Help
Accessibility
Press
Contact
Directory
Affiliates