This course too was very verbose and the last assignment would have been better done in pairs

I think the example on IBM is good, but on the lecture slide is not very easy to understand.

the labs dont work please fix them ASAP

i havent receive my badge common guys whats going on

personally, I think it is a bit wordy and the pictures in slides are of low resolution.

i cant start my next course until one of the assignments is graded.please look into it

Statistical Tools were not explained in detail. Hence at one point it was confusing.

Overall course is good. But am unable to receive the certificate of this course.

The case study is a bit hard to follow and the explanations are bit too general.

This course needs to be updated so that the labs don't give unsupported errors.

Some summarized text support would have been useful for the final assignment.

It's good course but still need more explanations and examples to be clearer.

The assignment is not very clear. The example had better to be more iterative

It seemed a bit basic, so there´s a lot the student has to dig by themselves

a slight bit more technical than the previous two courses. Getting there ..

It could be prepared much easier. It is hard to understand for non-natives

Examples and case study in video of CHF was a bit difficult to understand.

Personally, very dull course material; please generate me a certificate.

I think that should have more information. And quizzes should be harder.

Case study should be covered in more detail. The other content is good.

This module would be more beneficial after learning basic ML concepts.

The case study was not that good, some good examples need to be added.

I'd like to see exercises where we can practice the methodology phases

This course was a bit hard and the explanations were a bit difficult

the video lectures was really fast making it difficult to understand

too much information on slides. Use more pictures for visualization.