Learner Reviews & Feedback for Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling by University of Pennsylvania
About the Course
Top reviews
NM
Jul 22, 2017
Very good background to quantitative modelling. It gets a bit heavy on the mathematical formulas in places, but if you follow through, it helps cement understanding. Good speed/pace of material.
SB
Apr 9, 2020
Amazing learning, easy to follow descriptive examples, enough detailed content and examples to go in depth in the subjects. I really appreciate how well put together this program is. Thank you!
1651 - 1675 of 1,737 Reviews for Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling
By Chalal S
•Oct 8, 2021
The explaining is good, but the concepts in the course are basic.
By Dominique B
•Apr 8, 2020
a bit too simple, I would have expected more practical excersises
By TheSovereignIndividual
•Apr 13, 2020
Nice, course - could spend more time on practice and examples.
By Anup K D
•May 2, 2021
Need more examples. Logarithmic Regression was not very clear
By mariisha
•Jun 10, 2023
Too simplistic and would benefit from more in-depth content
By Bunta S
•Oct 14, 2022
This course is mainly on statistic not finance modeling.
By Olivia X
•Sep 18, 2016
too easy. not enough practical skills or tools teaching
By Abhishek P
•Feb 9, 2017
There should be lab or hands one calculation exercise.
By Steeve V
•Feb 3, 2017
It was theoretical but provided an apt understanding.
By Jessica D
•Oct 13, 2023
Really learned a lot but my favorite subject though
By Aeshvry R
•Feb 18, 2022
Was little difficult and had non engaging lectures
By Roman P
•Mar 31, 2018
Questions with actual raw data would be helpful.
By Marissa P
•Nov 15, 2024
would love feedback- detailed answers to quiz
By Craig K
•May 6, 2017
More reading about theory than actual doing.
By Daguo X
•Apr 18, 2017
Too fundamental, too easy. No depth in math
By Chitralekha S G
•Jun 28, 2021
The course could have been more analytical
By Sushant R
•Jul 21, 2023
It was basic knowledge but well explained
By Rajeev J
•Sep 11, 2022
Good teacher but content was very light.
By Ardavan S
•Apr 12, 2020
I already knew most of the topics taught.
By RADHIKA W
•Apr 8, 2020
Could have added more about monte carlo
By Manabu W
•Mar 6, 2016
please improve hand-out for self study.
By Ömer B
•Dec 11, 2020
too basic. but the instructor is great
By Lokesh M
•Jul 13, 2020
Good and nice Analysis of each model
By komal s
•Mar 23, 2021
It should have been more practical.
By Jeff K
•Mar 12, 2016
A little too basic, but still good.