Learner Reviews & Feedback for Understanding Research Methods by University of London
About the Course
Top reviews
RP
Apr 30, 2020
The course was very simple and easily understandable. The assignments were very interesting. The peer review activity provided scope to learn from the others too. It was a great learning experience.
JV
Apr 28, 2021
The readings were excellent, and readable 0 which is a plus for a course such as this.The 1 or zero peer-review rating was 'rough' and maybe 0 to 5 to differentiate effort and results in the e-tivity.
2626 - 2650 of 2,723 Reviews for Understanding Research Methods
By Emil
•Jul 13, 2020
This was definitely a strange course.
By Muhammad U
•Dec 20, 2023
please include some assignments
By Md M I K I
•May 20, 2023
This course need more contents.
By Mhmad J H
•Mar 30, 2023
good, could be better
By AUGUSTINE K K
•Jul 11, 2022
a nice course to take
By Dissanayake M B D D
•Aug 8, 2020
great work. loved it.
By Francisco P
•May 29, 2018
It is a basic course
By dimithra d
•Apr 29, 2024
just interviews only
By Moses M M
•Dec 14, 2022
It is quite shallow
By Moetaz s
•Aug 22, 2017
Good For Beginners
By CALIMANUT I C
•Feb 28, 2019
too basic I'd say
By Meroona G
•Oct 21, 2017
Need improvement
By Nicolas-Patience B
•Oct 6, 2015
Helpful insight.
By MAHIMA
•May 19, 2020
Good initiative
By Ung T L
•Jun 17, 2022
Underwhelming
By Vaishnavi.N
•Jun 19, 2020
Good learning
By Dr. S M A T
•Aug 13, 2020
Good Course.
By dylan s l c
•Mar 17, 2025
masomenos
By Alfredo C M
•Sep 22, 2016
esta bien
By hafid i
•May 10, 2020
was good
By AM G
•Sep 16, 2022
not bad
By Varghese J (
•Nov 8, 2019
Average
By tewodros t
•Jun 23, 2025
thanks
By Deleted A
•Dec 21, 2024
good
By jaime v s
•Dec 16, 2019
I found the course useful because it made me think of a project I am working on. How ever, I found it way too short, I completed the four weeks in for days of light work (between 1-2 hours). I found the feedback I received a disappointment, with usually just a line of writing saying "good job", which seems to me that students just fill it up as a requirement. I found the chapters most useful, and I think it was a good call making the tasks around them; that being said, most of the work I reviewed (about this chapters) wasn´t about the chapters or the task at hand. I don´t know how others reviewed but I suspect they didn´t care and put up a passing grade. I would´ve liked more serious evaluations, and more tasks for that matter -maybe two for each week, one for the videos and one for a chapter-. Talking about the videos, I found them interesting but mostly too short and on the surface. I know the price is low because of the limitations present, but I don´t think that's excuse for the lack of content.