Chevron Left
Back to Generative AI: Prompt Engineering Basics

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Generative AI: Prompt Engineering Basics by IBM

4.8
stars
6,956 ratings

About the Course

As generative AI (GenAI) reshapes workplaces and job roles, using it effectively is now essential. Prompt engineering is the key to directing GenAI models and refining their output for desired results. This course is for professionals, executives, students, and AI enthusiasts ready to harness prompt engineering to unlock tools like ChatGPT. You’ll learn practical techniques, structured methods, and best practices for crafting strong prompts. Explore zero-shot and few-shot prompting to boost reliability and output quality. Discover advanced methods such as the Interview Pattern, Chain-of-Thought, and Tree-of-Thought to produce accurate, context-aware responses. Hands-on labs and projects provide experience with multimodal prompting, the playoff method, and image generation. You’ll practice blending text and visuals and evaluating AI outputs for precision and usefulness. Podcasts, dialogues, and discussions link theory to real-world scenarios, while expert insights highlight strategies for effective prompt use. A final project and graded assessments ensure you can apply these techniques with confidence, leaving you with practical, job-ready skills. Hear from practitioners about the techniques and artistry behind writing impactful prompts. Enroll today to master prompt engineering and unlock GenAI’s potential....

Top reviews

NM

Nov 14, 2024

This course is well suited for anyone curious about AI, informing others, or teaching in the classroom. The examples are assisted by IBM Watsonx.ai, an amazing interactive tool. Get started now!!

HD

Jul 24, 2025

This course was an eye-opening introduction into the power of prompt engineering and how strategic inputs can drive more accurate, creative, and relevant responses from generative AI models.

Filter by:

1951 - 1975 of 2,044 Reviews for Generative AI: Prompt Engineering Basics

By Shubhankar C E 2 B

Jul 14, 2025

good

By Shaheen P

Jul 13, 2025

good

By KAROL Y V C

Jun 1, 2025

nada

By Isabella G

May 7, 2025

bien

By Hemamalini R

May 7, 2025

good

By Haritha S

Apr 15, 2025

good

By DINA M R C

Mar 2, 2025

Dina

By Habibullah K

Jan 29, 2025

nice

By 081-PRAVIN K P

Nov 28, 2024

Good

By Juan C C S

Nov 19, 2024

bien

By Samuel A P O

Sep 13, 2024

Bien

By DILAN A E L

Jun 23, 2025

dil

By Kantesh K

Jun 16, 2025

gr8

By Dhruv n

Apr 10, 2025

Vfd

By 505_ S S

Sep 24, 2024

nyc

By davide 2

Oct 6, 2025

jj

By Daniel E s

Oct 23, 2025

.

By DANA S R M

Aug 22, 2025

.

By EVER D B S

Jun 2, 2025

4

By lizeth m

Feb 27, 2025

4

By jean k r

Nov 14, 2024

.

By Abhilash

Oct 25, 2024

.

By Edna N P H

Oct 11, 2024

b

By Juan S A A

Sep 7, 2024

.

By Aurora-Alexandra C

Oct 29, 2025

I found that the course wasn’t as well structured as I had expected. This became clear once I started taking notes and realized it was quite difficult to identify a logical flow or to group the information in a meaningful way. The material often felt fragmented, which made it harder to see how different concepts connect to each other. Another aspect that stood out to me was the format of the lessons. Most of the course consists of static slides or images accompanied by a rather impersonal voiceover. In previous courses, we had instructors who appeared on screen or interacted directly with the learners, explaining concepts in a more dynamic and engaging way. That personal interaction made a big difference in maintaining attention and motivation, and I really missed that here. Additionally, the examples provided throughout the course tend to be quite long and sometimes difficult to follow. While detailed examples can be useful, in this case they often felt overwhelming, and it was hard to extract the key ideas or practical takeaways. Breaking them into smaller, clearer parts or providing summaries after each example might make the content much easier to digest. Overall, I appreciate the effort that went into creating the course, but I think it could be significantly improved by refining its structure, increasing human interaction, and making the examples more concise and focused.