Learner Reviews & Feedback for Generative AI: Prompt Engineering Basics by IBM
About the Course
Top reviews
NM
Nov 14, 2024
This course is well suited for anyone curious about AI, informing others, or teaching in the classroom. The examples are assisted by IBM Watsonx.ai, an amazing interactive tool. Get started now!!
HD
Jul 24, 2025
This course was an eye-opening introduction into the power of prompt engineering and how strategic inputs can drive more accurate, creative, and relevant responses from generative AI models.
1951 - 1975 of 2,044 Reviews for Generative AI: Prompt Engineering Basics
By Shubhankar C E 2 B
•Jul 14, 2025
good
By Shaheen P
•Jul 13, 2025
good
By KAROL Y V C
•Jun 1, 2025
nada
By Isabella G
•May 7, 2025
bien
By Hemamalini R
•May 7, 2025
good
By Haritha S
•Apr 15, 2025
good
By DINA M R C
•Mar 2, 2025
Dina
By Habibullah K
•Jan 29, 2025
nice
By 081-PRAVIN K P
•Nov 28, 2024
Good
By Juan C C S
•Nov 19, 2024
bien
By Samuel A P O
•Sep 13, 2024
Bien
By DILAN A E L
•Jun 23, 2025
dil
By Kantesh K
•Jun 16, 2025
gr8
By Dhruv n
•Apr 10, 2025
Vfd
By 505_ S S
•Sep 24, 2024
nyc
By davide 2
•Oct 6, 2025
jj
By Daniel E s
•Oct 23, 2025
.
By DANA S R M
•Aug 22, 2025
.
By EVER D B S
•Jun 2, 2025
4
By lizeth m
•Feb 27, 2025
4
By jean k r
•Nov 14, 2024
.
By Abhilash
•Oct 25, 2024
.
By Edna N P H
•Oct 11, 2024
b
By Juan S A A
•Sep 7, 2024
.
By Aurora-Alexandra C
•Oct 29, 2025
I found that the course wasn’t as well structured as I had expected. This became clear once I started taking notes and realized it was quite difficult to identify a logical flow or to group the information in a meaningful way. The material often felt fragmented, which made it harder to see how different concepts connect to each other. Another aspect that stood out to me was the format of the lessons. Most of the course consists of static slides or images accompanied by a rather impersonal voiceover. In previous courses, we had instructors who appeared on screen or interacted directly with the learners, explaining concepts in a more dynamic and engaging way. That personal interaction made a big difference in maintaining attention and motivation, and I really missed that here. Additionally, the examples provided throughout the course tend to be quite long and sometimes difficult to follow. While detailed examples can be useful, in this case they often felt overwhelming, and it was hard to extract the key ideas or practical takeaways. Breaking them into smaller, clearer parts or providing summaries after each example might make the content much easier to digest. Overall, I appreciate the effort that went into creating the course, but I think it could be significantly improved by refining its structure, increasing human interaction, and making the examples more concise and focused.