Learner Reviews & Feedback for Vector Calculus for Engineers by The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
About the Course
Top reviews
BP
May 14, 2021
Professor Chasnov is a great instructor. I strongly recommend this course (and others from his). Thank you so much for making such great quality content available for everyone no matter where.
SL
May 26, 2021
Well taught, high-paced. It needs effort to understand the material but there is nothing wrong with that. Much clearer than in my first degree, which was many years ago!
351 - 375 of 384 Reviews for Vector Calculus for Engineers
By Ahmed A T
•Aug 28, 2021
a very good course. Thanks a lot for professor Chasnov
By Farman u
•May 28, 2023
interesting and helpful in teaching vector calculus
By ka h N
•May 3, 2021
A challenging but useful egineering math course!
By César A L L
•May 2, 2020
Great introduction to multivariate calculus.
By Ezra B
•Jul 12, 2021
Was pretty hard to understand after week 2.
By Trinanjan B
•Jun 27, 2021
Good course to learn the basics!
By Vaigund.v
•Feb 4, 2022
it ok not that much useful
By Oluwanifemi A
•Jul 2, 2020
It was well explanatory
By GURUPRASATH N
•Apr 24, 2025
GOOD KNOWLEDGE GAINING
By manohar r
•Jun 10, 2020
Good one for learners.
By Qamar A
•May 19, 2020
teacher is very good
By Mr. A G
•Aug 18, 2021
its a good course..
By Nanda K
•Sep 29, 2020
good so useful
By K. B L
•Apr 26, 2020
useful course
By Udoh U E
•Jul 9, 2020
It was good.
By Vidhya A P
•Aug 31, 2020
very useful
By Gajanan D
•Aug 6, 2020
Very nice
By Dr R M
•Jun 5, 2020
excellent
By rameshwari
•Jan 27, 2023
Good
By Kariyapperuma A D R K
•Dec 22, 2020
good
By aithagoni m
•Jun 26, 2020
good
By Sumathi M
•Feb 2, 2023
nil
By Carlos M G
•Mar 16, 2021
m
By Ogunpola J G
•Jul 12, 2020
I
By Mauro
•Sep 20, 2024
Pros: -Professor seemed very enthusiastic. -Topics were explained in a thorough yet concise manner. -Practice exercises were useful to review topics. -Professor was very quick when answering questions. -I especially liked how derivation and integration were taught, it was very useful. Cons: -My main issue is probably with assessments. The material given was rather difficult (which is not necessarily a bad thing), yet assessments were quite trivial. All of them were multiple choice questions with practically an infinite number of possible attempts, so although I carefully read through the entirety of the material, I do not feel as accomplished. A simple solution for this would be to ask for a numerical solution to problems. -Related to the previous point, all practice quizzes had their answers in the answer sheets, which also decreases the effort needed for the course (no, I am not going to try and solve all of them on my own if I have the answer right there). -A few topics were not very useful (e.g., quaternions, Kronecker-delta, Einstein's summation). I understand their historical significance, but they were taught briefly in a very specific context and never again used. -Professor's answers were often too succint. -A few demonstrations skipped a step or two, which made reading sometimes more difficult than it should have. Nevertheless, I appreciate the effort put into the answer sheets. -I would had liked a few more intuitive real-life situations (e.g., electrodynamics), as to relate the course to engineering.