Learner Reviews & Feedback for Convolutional Neural Networks by DeepLearning.AI
About the Course
Top reviews
NK
Jul 10, 2024
Fabulously designed, I could confidently say that the programming exercise is sufficiently sophisticated, and yet managed to be not so difficult as to deter new learners. All in all a great course!
SB
Aug 4, 2021
T​his course has been one of the harder ones in the specialization. I found some of the programming exercises to be somewhat challenging. I am really glad I finished it! Time to head to Course 5 now!
5276 - 5300 of 5,641 Reviews for Convolutional Neural Networks
By A 6 W A
•Sep 22, 2020
great course
By Steve d l C
•Aug 27, 2020
good course
By Sahil M
•May 5, 2020
The Besttt.
By ANKUR G
•Sep 15, 2019
informative
By Sonia D
•Jan 30, 2019
Very Useful
By Luca M B
•Aug 1, 2018
Quite nice.
By AYOUB A I
•Sep 2, 2021
Thank you!
By Rishi J
•Jul 25, 2020
Insightful
By Yehang H
•Jan 2, 2018
Some error
By Mohamed A M
•Oct 5, 2020
thank you
By Yashwanth M
•Jul 16, 2019
Very Good
By Dave L
•Jul 10, 2020
good job
By PRASANNA V R
•Jun 30, 2020
Decent
By Krishna P D C
•Mar 31, 2020
Thanks
By Niranjan A
•Nov 25, 2017
Great
By Hozoy
•Feb 22, 2022
good
By Sumera H
•Sep 13, 2020
good
By Isha J
•Apr 5, 2020
good
By Subhash A
•Mar 27, 2020
good
By VIGNESHKUMAR R
•Oct 24, 2019
good
By Rahila T
•Oct 8, 2018
Good
By naveen k
•Jul 17, 2018
good
By Panchal S V
•Jun 28, 2018
Good
By CARLOS G G
•Jul 24, 2018
g
By Volodymyr M
•Apr 24, 2020
This is not an education in any way. Yes, Convolutional Neural Networks provides good overview of convolutional networks and technology behind it. I like the way Andrew Ng structured material and his way to explain some details. Unfortunately, as a common problem for all "Deep Learning Specialization", theoretical material only scratches the surface of the knowledge. There is nothing deep in terms of theory. You will have to spend quite a lot of time digging for information yourself if you plan to use course material for any practical task, or assignment. In order to get missing pieces, I got to go through whole Spring 2017 CS231n. It is fine if you have enough time to see two sets of videos, but I expected to get same quality of material here, on Coursera.
Another course issue is quizzes. I am puzzled what these quizzes are testing. Provided answers often assume tentatively more than one correct variant. Probability theory works against you - you may happen to select correct answers for some questions , but definitely, not all of them. In the same time, it is quite easy to derive correct variant from second try.
Course programming assignments are complete disaster. While I kind liked programming assignments from week 1 and 2, I felt like I wasted my time working on programming assignments from week 3 and 4. I expected programming assignment to guide me through some training of complex networks, give some practical insight, which I can use for real-life tasks, but it was not there.
There is a good introduction to TensorFlow, while Keras is not even touched. And many assignments of week 3 and 4 are using Keras. It is necessary to peek-up theory and practice regarding Keras elsewhere. After one get enough knowledge about Keras elsewhere - guess what - programming assignment becomes useless as education, because it is too trivial.
I really wanted to rate this course as Two-Stars, but video materials and programming assignments from week 1 and week 2 slightly improved my attitude.