Learner Reviews & Feedback for Experimentation for Improvement by McMaster University
About the Course
Top reviews
CC
Nov 6, 2024
It is an interesting course in the context of DOE. Topics are well-developed and the concepts behinds each design from full factorials to fractioned and RSM are well explained. I recommend it.
SZ
Apr 10, 2019
Satisfying course content and structure. Reasonable course speed. Nice, practical reference. Good introduction to design of experiments and response surface methods.
226 - 237 of 237 Reviews for Experimentation for Improvement
By jaime p a b
•Jul 16, 2017
es muy bueno lo recomiendo
By Charles B
•Jul 7, 2020
is incredible!
By Samith A P O
•May 25, 2020
Muy buen curso
By Benny A R V
•Apr 28, 2017
Muy Buen Curso
By Hizbullah M
•Mar 15, 2019
very helpful
By ASMA S A M
•Sep 21, 2021
excellent
By Akibu B A
•Oct 27, 2020
Very good
By MARIA C H
•Jun 1, 2020
Muy buena
By Yu y
•Mar 10, 2022
Great!
By Harsh G
•Sep 26, 2016
PROS
Great explanations by the instructor. Easy to understand course- with real world examples.
CONS
Pacing was too slow.
Too simple and easy for the 5 weeks of coursework in my opinion. Several harder concepts could be covered in the time that the course ran. Problems were also very simple and not very challenging.
By milad Y
•Apr 15, 2020
A good course for beginners to start learning process optimization. There is absolutely no need to have such a long quizzes to evaluate students. The design of quizzes is so bad which i wanted to quit the course even I needed the certificate.
By Aubin, P
•Oct 31, 2015
I dislike the way the grade is settled. Because of the difficulty and technicality of the course, passing grade should be 7 out of 9, instead of 8 out of 9. We are not PhD's, but student learners.......