Learner Reviews & Feedback for Machine Learning with Python by IBM
About the Course
Top reviews
HR
Sep 5, 2021
This course just gave me substantial and valuable knowledge on ml algorithms and how to apply it using python. As a result, it was a benefiting journey for me. Thanks a lot for such a course.
RV
Jan 14, 2025
good course , some part is typical more statistical part shown, even i have good understanding of ML , so new learner will find little typical. rest tutor voice and language is understandable.
2826 - 2850 of 3,175 Reviews for Machine Learning with Python
By Rupesh J
•Jul 15, 2025
good
By Srijam S
•Apr 25, 2025
good
By Prince K
•Apr 23, 2025
Nice
By PUSHPRAJ J
•Apr 13, 2025
good
By Sungyong P
•Feb 3, 2025
good
By kanimozhi g
•Sep 14, 2024
good
By Abdoulaye W D
•Oct 7, 2023
GOOD
By Muqseet F
•Apr 17, 2023
good
By Girija S M
•Aug 24, 2022
nice
By A R
•Feb 20, 2022
good
By Anshuman R
•Jul 15, 2021
good
By Mullangi T
•Jun 21, 2021
GOOD
By SHALINI S
•Sep 6, 2020
Good
By Zakir H
•Jul 19, 2020
Good
By Sudhanshu R
•Jun 12, 2020
good
By Tejas S
•Apr 28, 2020
good
By VIGNESHKUMAR R
•Dec 26, 2019
Good
By Lakshmi N
•Dec 10, 2019
Good
By lokesh s
•Jul 17, 2019
good
By Hiep D X
•Oct 18, 2022
ok
By syed s
•Aug 8, 2021
wow
By piyush s
•May 19, 2020
ok
By Pagadala G s
•May 18, 2020
Ok
By RABAB E
•Dec 14, 2023
.
By Malte H
•Jan 11, 2021
PRO: Good overview and basic introduction of common machine learning techniques.
CON:
- The final assignment is peer reviewed! I saw no mention of this before purchasing the course. This means you are at the mercy of other students who may have less experience than you and may notbe qualified in grading assignments. Also it may mean you have to wait a long time before you get your certificate. It would be better to implement a Kaggle-style assessment of the models and use that to obtain a score and turn that into a grade. This would be transparent and instantaneous.
Some of the forum answers provided by the teaching staff are half baked and often inconsistent. e.g. they give example code for making a figure and and also a figure. But the figure is obviously not made with the provided code and the code contains typos. This is frustrating and makes learning harder than it should be.
Some of the code in the lab exercises don’t obey good practices. e.g. in every lab the data is normalised before train/test splitting. In the final project there is a comment that this should be done the other way around (and it really should!). Why not do it the right way in all the examples throughout the course?