Chevron Left
Back to Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare by Stanford University

121 ratings
32 reviews

About the Course

With artificial intelligence applications proliferating throughout the healthcare system, stakeholders are faced with both opportunities and challenges of these evolving technologies. This course explores the principles of AI deployment in healthcare and the framework used to evaluate downstream effects of AI healthcare solutions. The Stanford University School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Visit the FAQs below for important information regarding 1) Date of original release and Termination or expiration date; 2) Accreditation and Credit Designation statements; 3) Disclosure of financial relationships for every person in control of activity content....

Top reviews


Apr 7, 2022

This course was really valuable for linking and embedding my knowledge gained by reading FDA guidance documents and knowledge sharing from my Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs colleagues


Mar 5, 2021

This is a holistic course giving all perspectives and knowledge on the different aspects of evaluating all kind of AI driven solutions in healthcare. A must do for all healthcare Managers.

Filter by:

26 - 31 of 31 Reviews for Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare

By Natalia K

Aug 25, 2021

There are several mistakes in the final exam questions. Check back. In terms of meaning, you can guess about the correct answer, but you need to fix it.

By Richard J

Apr 7, 2021


By Wael A

Sep 5, 2021

Instructor is reading a script, better slides required particularly when reciting examples. Could be better structured.

By Yuanqin M

Jan 21, 2021

too many theories but no practica examples or exercises

By Francesca M B

Jan 8, 2022

Very US focused

By Ferrum H

Sep 21, 2021

Lots of material, but the presentation was not in line with good learning practices. Information was presented very rapidly and dryly. Course bounced around a lot from topic to topic without a clear summary of what was learned at the end. Lots of industry buzzwords without really clearly connecting how to apply in real life situations.