excellent

很好best

Interesting course. It's difficult to cover everything in such a short course. The last two weeks' classes have not much to do with "miracles" of languages. I would say these things are common to all languages. I would have preferred to concentrate more on firs 4 weeks topics. This all stuff with politeness does not fit much in the topic. It's more sociolinguistics, cultural studies etc. And there is not much to learn. There is no much valuable information to remember. I liked more the beginning about sounds, typology of languages etc. This all stuff with positive and negative face was a little strange. Specially, it was difficult to do the tests with these "faces". Listening exercises were quite OK, but for instance to decode Chinese without transcription was impossible task. All these exercises with language mistakes was also strange. If we all do pronunciation mistakes in all languages what’s the point to study these mistakes? What's the point to see what mistake is made in Basque, Gungbe or any other language? I saw this exercise as pure waste of my time. So, my general suggestion would be to concentrate on pure linguistic things (first 4 weeks) and do not go into field of sociology, neuro or psycholinguistics. BTW this couple of students is not balanced because the young man dominates all discussions. The girl should be more active or the man less active.

Too difficult for an introductory course. Ambiguous information. Time estimates are way off. Not what I expected. Rather provincial in its approach. Guess I'm just not cut out to be a linguist. Answers to the tests are not available or derivable from the lectures and required readings. I've read a lot of articles and books, particularly about neurolinguistics and the intersection between linguistics and genomics and the information in the course does not really assist with understanding what I've been reading, though I can sort of see how the authors might have made use of some of the things presented here. The interview with Chomsky was particularly useless.

Interesting course. Some have argued it can be biased and I don't know enough to say one way or the other. But the quizzes are ridiculously difficult. They should not be easy but how is telling me 90% of students failed on the first attempt not worth changing the format? I am currently stuck with a repeated 77.77% on week 3's quiz after watching the videos several times and taking good notes. The only way I can see myself passing is to keep guessing multiple choice combinations until it happens, which defeats the point of taking a course. I am joining many others in saying this is a good course but the quizzes make it unbearable and not worth trying to complete.

This course was interesting. It was interesting learning about linguistics and the various things related to languages. The only problem was that the quizzes were too hard. I feel like the quizzes were too hard for an introductory course to Linguistics. Many times, it was frustrating because it took me two or three tries just to pass them. I feel like this had a lot to do with how the questions were set up and through how it seemed like the answers to those questions weren't in the source material. My one recommendation would be to improve the quizzes.

The content was very interesting and offered in coherent ways. The quizzes, however, were more challenging than they needed to be. A lot of the questions were asked in unusual and unclear ways which made answering it very difficult because I wasn't always sure what exactly they were asking. I also found it difficult to know what exactly the answers meant as they often didn't correspond exactly to the way things were said in the lectures and readings, so even if you followed the content closely the answers didn't always make sense.

Overall, this was a good course, the content was very interesting. I enjoyed learning about languge and linguistics. The only issue I had was some of the quiz questions, especially questions about the language informants' videos. The videos themselves were not bad, just hard to follow for anyone not familiar with that language. And then the related questions in the quizzes were hard, I almost never got those ones right. I just feel like we shouldn't have to watch the videos again and again to answer 2-3 questions.

This course is good for those who are interested in linguistics and thinking of starting a professional linguistic studies. The course introduces some major linguistic subfields: linguistic typologist, neurolinguistics, psycholinguistics, phonologist, etc., but it's only introductions. You need to delve into the subfield you've got interested in if you want to really know about the specifics. A variety of reading materials are offered, and you can explore miracles of languages as much as you like!

The ethnologue is a mess, and I don't think a linguistics course should depend on a website to pass not only some questions, but almost half of a module, because you can understand perfectly what people is saying about their languages and you can formulate accurate questions that can be answered with the information given, and not researching in a web that has different content than the course provides, or changes the numbers, or absolutely ignore some important facts of languages searched.

It is a decent course that teaches the very basics of linguistics. It covers the topics of a Linguistics 101 course but no topic is explored in depth. It seems that some of the topics mentioned are barely even touched (e.g., Week 5 - Language in the Brain). Professor Oostendorp is a good lecturer but the lectures are not presented for easy notetaking. You should be prepared to make your own notes from the video lectures given few summaries/bulleted lists/etc.

I watched all the videos, but did not do the coursework.

I was a total beginner on the subject. The videos were very well made, and quite nice to watch.

However, I feel like the material was a bit too easy for my taste. I would have enjoyed a course that delved into "harder things".

For someone who doesn't like as much "hard challenges" as I do, I do think that this course is a nice introduction to the subject.

I've watched the first module and it was good.

Only that the website that we are supposed to get the answers for the first week's quiz ( the last 5-6 questions ) from, is not working. And I have to take the quiz several times to find the answers. Please do something about it for the future learners, thank you.

I thought this class was very interesting, but I, like many others, was frustrated by the quizzes. Also, I tried to do the first honors assignment, but was at a big disadvantage using a language I don't know. How am I supposed to come up with counter examples when I don't know the language?

On the whole a nice introduction. In places the content was too broad and tried to cover too much, then in other areas the basic terms were glossed over where more time could be spent with more knowledge gained on the basics. But a nicely varied course.

The course assignments can be real tough and sometimes daunting to tackle. The overall experience could have been more fun learning about languages from various parts of the world. At times too much technical jargons bogged the course for beginners.

Hard to understand with the accents at times and I have gone through the videos while trying to find an answer for the quiz and it was never mentioned in the video so sometimes the quizzes don't match what was taught. Otherwise, I learned a lot.

I found the course very vague, the questions unclear and just generally not well done.. and some of the course references don't seem to work.. I also do not wish to discuss with others or join forums.

Very intersting but very time-consuming: in order to pass the tests with its tricky and detail-focused questions you need to read the questions carefuly and review all material a second time.

I was expecting that the course would cover IPA in-depth. It's pretty unconscionable that an intro linguistics course would not pay deep attention to this topic.

The quizzes in this class were the most difficult and confusing. I have had dozens of Coursera classes, but this course was the most troublesome.

I think this course has interesting participants however I found it difficult to follow and did not do well in this course.

It is a good course for an introducion to Linguistics. However, it is a ittle technical

I had a great and much needed introduction.

Tiffany B.

The course began with suggestions for best practices regarding time mgmt and module transition. It implied that the course could be completed with a minimum of study two days a week. It is a non-credited introductory course, as most MOOCs are. I like to complete MOOCs in 1/2 the given time if possible, so I planned for 4 days of study and committed for 3 days. I've taken a number of MOOCs over the years. This was the 1st that would be tracking my own use of my time. I soon found out why.

In the 1st hour I followed the projected times given for each individual step and divided the elements by 3 days. I had planned for a couple of hours of study on Sunday for my review before taking the mandatory quiz. That was mistake number one. I ended up spending a fruitless 15 hours on Sunday, unable to locate required reading material that I only found out about, listed near the end of my last day of study in the 1st week.

Leiden University also offered free membership to join the LSA, the Linguistic Society of America, no less, which provided world statistical demographics for the most active languages as well as those that were on their way out, were losing favor or had become extinct. I filled out the application for membership and set it aside until I could evaluate the different tiers of membership. It was clear to me this was probably not a free site for anyone with real academic credentials, so I approached joining the society carefully. That was mistake number two. When I returned to joining it a day or two later I was denied access, stating my free membership had been voided under suspicion of my trying to establish two free memberships. I cannot tell you how funny I found that, given at the time I was reading about Labov and the covert methods he suggested to be used to spy on socially deprived groups in order to best conduct his research.

There's more but it's no longer important. I can't register with the LSA because my degrees come from the University of Massachusetts, the University of Maine and Norwich University in Vermont, and none are listed on the society's application for membership. I ended up on Sunday thinking I was well ahead of the course's requirements, when I ran into the required reading list which also included articles from the BBC's nature programs. Several of their animal and nature series were given as required reading, but on Sunday morning, my last projected day of core studies. I tried signing on and joined, and my BBC subscriptions were confirmed by email, however, I couldn't get past the home page of their three different nature websites or locate either of these stories. I tried thru both You Tube and Spotify where I have held active subscriptions for years. Needless to say, most of the questions on the quiz were from these websites, the LSA site and the BBC sites.

As a last ditch effort I went through Leiden University's MA Linguistics course offerings to decide if it would be worth it to take an online MA, and I couldn't find a single one listed online. They appear to all require residence in the NL. I realize as far as the MOOC goes it's not the end of the world and I can still get past these hiccups, but hey, I'n 78 yrs old. I'm already in the same shute along with those languages which are down to their last speakers. The University of Maine has a Linguistics MA and it's tuition-free for Maine seniors. It's a no brainer.

I thank Leiden U and Prof Marc for introducing me to these disciplines. Good luck fellow students, and peace out.

Andrew Joseph Zanas