The entire course helped me learn a lot of things that are presently applicable to my line of work. The course was also presented in a clear and enjoyable manner. Kudos to the team!
The course instructors summarized large volumes of literature for us, reached a bottom line, and provided practical guidelines that I can apply immediately.
By SWATHI Y•
By Sandhiya M•
By maha a•
By Ajeetha A•
By Zoha J•
By Deleted A•
By Jennifer J•
This course was very engaging and thoughtfully designed and delivered. It offered a great variety of experiential learning through hands-on use of various tools, interviews with experts, and role-playing. The quizzes and assignments were spread throughout the course. There were also interesting lectures from subject matter experts on topics related to change management, pdsa quality improvement and strategic decision making. This was an excellent course!
By Javier P•
Prof. Davidson is a great teacher. This course deepens the foundations given in the first course of the program. It also shows some of the applications that Health informatics.
By DEEPA B•
Amazing course ,teaches everying indept,.very interesting and informative..Instructors are very good.
By MELIKE K•
ıt was a very interesting and excellent course with reading materials and graphic about this topic.
The readings and interviews were extremely helpful.
By Gelsomino C•
Great detailed quality info in Change Management
By maryglo e g•
this course helps me a lot
By Ramón A P C•
By Lyndon Z•
The course was well structured and really informative. The lectures are informative and helpful. The lecturers are knowledgeable on the topic. My only criticism would be responsiveness by the course admins. Flagged issues that were raised, were not responded to in a timely fashion.
By Mohamed S O•
The course focuses on important part of Health IT, which is change management and how can we work on preparing the medical staff to work in harmoney with the IT team.
By Mangena v V S S•
It's is nice course and gave an good idea over changes and management
By Rajesh K c•
Good knowledge for the human
By Vidhyakorn M•
Excellent course !!!
By Supha N K•
By Madhuri K•
By Bill Z•
Although the content is really great, the technical aspect of the course made me almost give up.
Most of the course is based on "conversations" between the professor and expects on the field. My opinion is that it was more like long interview rather than a conversation.
That being said, most of the interviews were recorded in crowded places, with a lot of noise in the background. And for some reason, the interviews that were recorded in a quite environment, the volume was so low that I was straggling to keep up.
Finally, some of the questions on the tests were too long, based on story telling.
too long, too many materials to cover and too many readings while the quizes and the assessment was not on the same line. I prefer to have a project or case study rather than all these readings which are all(no exception) out-dated.
Audio problems are in all the clips with Peter. Ashvi is too all about attitude. "You know" is the word that I heard all the way from her. Otherwise the content was not that much of use or being useful. Interviews are not that much of help. Teach. Teaching is much better. I am here to learn. I can watch TV or read magazines.
By Iszaid B I•
Intermediate and too many assignment. Question somehow leghty which make me confuse for time. This is my opinion
By Bruce F•
Until I submitted my assignment, I enjoyed the class. I am begrudgingly giving the class a single star as the individual who reviewed my assignment did so inaccurately and I am not sure how to protest this. If I can be satisfied, then my review may very well change. I am stymied that there is no easy method to question an individual's review.
The following are comments sent to my reviewer. I would appreciate instructions how I can remediate this situation.
1. As per instructions, "PROMPT
Please upload your detailed flowchart as a file attachment." The rubric, " Learner created a detailed flowchart (NOT a high-level flowchart).
Example of high level flowchart below:
MAKES NO SENSE!
2. "The flowchart is an accurate reflection of the actual process." In what way is my flow-chart NOT an accurate reflection of the process?
3. "Abbreviations were explained before they were used in the chart." This WAS NOT a criteria in the posted instructions - see details noted below. What kind of "TIE" is this??
9. The flowchart uses three or more decision nodes. The flowchart uses three (3) decision nodes noted in yellow. (1) "Is the Proposal approved..."; (2) "Is the Proposal recommended..."; (3) "Does TAC approve...".
10. The flowchart uses a decision node for something that was not a decision. Not an accurate review. Please note#9 above - all decision nodes were used - with Yes/No - accurately.
If this is a typical peer-review in this specialization, I cannot see the purpose to continue with these courses.