The course is fairly advanced and you would need to review the materials many times to understand the concept. The assignments are definitely fun and not as straightforward as other courses.
Superb study material. Learnt a lot during this course. I am not much into mathematical stuff, but got a hang of how to break problems and improve efficiency through parallelism.
By Aleh V•
Wrongly assumes that it'll be easier for students to jump from the conventional 'parallel' java paradigms and constructs to parallel streams.
Not a good job on explaining why. It'll require from students some efforts to create the right picture in their minds.
Exercises are great and partially make up for the above mentioned shortcomings.
Some example code is very bad and goes against all the 'good' things being taught by Martin in the first course of the specialization.
By Valerio M•
Interesting course, but far too short. It ends up giving a quick introduction to some of the aspects of parallel programming. I enjoyed the assignments, apart from last one where the difficulty was more about the context of the example than any parallel programming aspects. That example, extended, could be a good capstone project, but I think it was not appropriate as a course assignment. I prefer courses that follow a book, and this course didn't.
By Rachapong C•
This course is interesting like the 1st and 2nd course.
However, don't expect to receive any feedback or help in the forum like the first 2 courses. There is none.
I've completed the course for 12 days and yet my questions in the week 1 and 2 forums still haven't been answered at all. The question on the final assignment still haven't been answered either, so I'm still in the dark of how a part of my program was wrong.
By 家伟 陈•
Not friendly with beginners in Scala. You will be presented with tons of Scala code with minimal detailing on algorithms. Obviously the lecture expects you to be quite familiar with Java and Scala. And the lecture is not very informative either (at least for green hands in Scala). I found that the best way that works for me is to pause at each slide, study the code, and then go on to see what the lecture has to say.
By Sangam K•
I didn't like the last assignment. I didn't think there was much to learn there. I would've liked to implement more splitters and combiners. I did like the first 3 assignments very much. The lectures were pretty good, but I found myself loving some, and hating the others. I would've preferred more practical applications over theory. I think the lectures are un-necessarily math heavy.
By Hadrien H•
Content is good, less well polished than Odersky's courses though. Painful exercises with a lot of time spent on understanding the instructions instead of focusing on learning parallelism methods (especially the final assignment). Overall happy to have learnt from this, but clarity of assignments should be improved.
By Andy D•
In my view, this course was nowhere near as good as the earlier courses by Prof Odersky. The materials and pacing seemed all over the place - in some cases excessive time was spent going through quite trivial concepts, while elsewhere the course seemed quite rushed when looking at much more complicated ideas.
By Ostap O•
The course does a good job introducing the concepts for parallel programming, however fails to introduce the libraries and programming concepts the assignments use to bring parallel algorithms to life. Would be great to have week 2 or 3 go over the tools to bridge this gap.
By Shad A•
This course could have been better in my opinion, if we could have exercise that would deal with the concepts in more detail. I felt myself involved deeply in understanding the problem statement, rather than practicing the concepts explained in the course.
By Federico L•
Good content. Very basic overview of parallel programming algorithms and data structures in scala. Course feel a little bit hacked together although not as bad as the Functional Program Design one.
Course should be more in depth.
By masaaki f•
Online video is OK. But assignments are not much related to parallel programming specific issues. One case, this is my opinion but it's nice if students learn how scala solves "The dining philosophers" issue.
By Pavel O•
Good course. But I have a strong feeling that would be nice to have more focus on the practice. Some lecture not really much with the results of assignments. Good course anyway. Pavel
By Rudolf Z•
Most of assignments are good. They show applications of parallel programming very well. Some lectures are booring? but important. For instance, lectures about assotiativity.
By Shriraj B•
The content presented definitely is good, but in the assignment the things used could be explained in the lectures for better understanding of learners.
By Luis V•
Good course and good level on the assignments but needs a lot of improvement on the lectures, specially in the two last weeks.
Хочется получить опыт работы с примитивами scala для параллельного программирования, а не с готовыми болванками
By Joseph K•
Lectures are not easy to understand. It almost feels like they plucked various sections from a longer course.
By Carlos V•
No presentaba los topicos que deseaba. Ya no deseo el cruso, y no se muestra como darme de baja.
By Igor M•
There are not clear test errors, that points to another place in code where mistake is placed.
By Gabriel G•
Deep lectures, but exercises where more about complex problems than about parallel programing
By Igor W•
Too much imperative technics in this "functional" parallel programming course.
By Igor C•
The course if good, but i believe the content should be more didactic.
By Cedric D B•
Good but too theoretical and not very didactic.
By Evgenii S•
For now, the worst course in Specialization.
By Lestar C•
Not enough Scala. Akka version was better :(