Learner Reviews & Feedback for Python Functions, Files, and Dictionaries by University of Michigan
About the Course
Top reviews
Good course, had a great hands on practice with the Runestone Notebook Environment.\n\nAppreciate the efforts of the instructors and whoever has designed in making the course and helped delivering it.
It's amazing learn for beginner .A wonderful learning resource and very simple way explains everything . Excellent lessons ,check your understanding ,e-book ,practice, and quiz work and lot of thing
601 - 615 of 615 Reviews for Python Functions, Files, and Dictionaries
By Vineetha B
•good
By Keerthivasan R
•good
By Raul C S
•The final project explanation is not complete. The peer reviewed part of the final project shouldn't be there. I think the peer reviewed part of the final project is not necessary to prove the acquired knowledge in this course.
By Josh J
•The course went well until the final. There was content that was not taught in the class, but you were expected to know how to do it. I think the curriculum was fine and was content was interesting to go through.
By Gabriel C
•The course is good and the material is good too. The peer review is useless and doesn't make any sense due you have to wait until other decided to pick your work what can be ages.
By Mohammad H
•The course was very good, but the lack of support and the staff not answering our questions is unacceptable.
By Swetha S
•peer review takes lot of time and that was the only thing remaining for my course to be completed.
By Jeffrey B
•Some more coverage on csv files especially practice would have been nice
By ASIF S
•csv, break and continue were not so clear
By Amsebrid
•this course is challenging
By Weerachai Y
•thanks
By Riya B
•tough
By D d g
•Good
By Hanno H
•In itself, a good course. If you want to take this course, I recommend it. If you are, however, taking this entire specialization I suggest you walk away. The final course (course 5) is a course by someone who has not been lecturing in the course, presenting something they obviously are very fond of. The course work is, and I quote, "a project with minimal scaffolding. Expect to use the the discussion forums to gain insights! It’s not cheating to ask others for opinions or perspectives". In other words, part of the learning target is to work through bad or incomplete documentation and to solve an exercise that is stated without providing the information you need to solve it. Unless someone else already went through the moves, the lecturer fully expects you to fail by yourself.
If I wanted to feel the pain of learning without help or instructions, I would have just worked with the online manuals ... which is what this exercise openly tells you they want you to do. Its a shame for the other 4 courses, which are well done and have passionate lecturers.
By Ashwin J
•The assignment for the course is too lengthy too understand.
Coursera Footer
