I really enjoyed this course, especially because it combines all different components (DNN, CONV-NET, and RNN) together in one application. I look forward to taking more courses from deeplearning.ai.
It was an amazing experience to learn from such great experts in the field and get a complete understanding of all the concepts involved and also get thorough understanding of the programming skills.
By Angel S•
This course teaches just the very basics
By Robert M•
Model did not predict well.
By Naim H•
where is the assignment
By Ksh N S•
audio volume very less
By Gerardo S•
a little bit to light
By Artem K•
Plz more practice :)
By Kai J J•
A little to easy.
By Masoud V•
By Leonardo R•
I have done the initial Deep learning courses of Andrew, and they were very thorough and well explained. I was expecting the same quality, however, it was not so. Explanations were generally good, but the examples and the details around the architecture of the models were barely discussed or considered, besides pointing me to the next course (which I have done). I was a bit disappointed TBH, for an "applied" course I do not think this provides enough material to begin applying this knowledge into real life problems.
By Joanne R•
Really poor quality, sadly. The notebooks are full of errors, the quizzes are mostly coding questions instead of being about deeper understanding of the notions studied, and I don't think the videos are clear enough about what decisions are most important when building this type of model and how to make those decisions. Love the topic, but very disappointed, and don't think this is worth what I'm paying..
By Andrei I•
The course is merely a walk-through some Jupiter notebooks of Laurence. There are no proper slides with explanation of what's going on. I also don't see much activity from the course creators on the discussion forums. It is incredibly easy to complete the course without forming any deep understanding.
The weekly programming exercises are not even automatically checked for accuracy.
By Ebdulmomen A•
quiz's are pathetic! throughout the whole course the instructor talks about the advantages of RNN and LSTM and CNNs for time series prediction while not being able to prove this not even for one in the entire course, what a disappointment !
By Kaushal T•
The course was not as detailed or in a flow like I expected from a deeplearning.ai course and the editing was also very bad, one thing was shown and something else was spoken.
By Victor H•
A bit too high-level with lacking explanation on intuition. E.g. Conv1D was added to LSTM layers which helped reduce loss value, but did not go into the explanation of why.
By Tomek D•
Course is very quick and does not cover the topics in sufficient depth - explanations and discussion are all very brief.
By Yevhen D•
This course will be good only for very beginners. It's not deep and challenging enough.
By Sergey K•
To make it better you have to develop more challenging and GRADED! exercises
By Sujin S•
Poor audio quality.. Cant even hear in full volume
By Gabor S•
Very bad quizzes, no challenge whatsoever.
By Bojiang J•
Too much repetition in the content.
By Ankit G•
Could have been better
By Magdalena S•
By Xiaotian Z•
I do hope that the deeplearning.ai team could spend more time polishing the materials instead of just throwing the Tensorflow docs/sample codes and going through them superficially. Please also change the instructor as I really doubt his professionalism/experiences in ML practices despite his titles. Please, please don't ruin your brand, deeplearning.ai. I wish to see more in-depth courses like the ones taught by Andrew.
Maybe I had wrong expectations from this course. But to me it felt like the material in this course was extremely superficial. I was hoping to learn something, but it turned out to be a very basic overview of the material. Everything boiled down to "compile + fit" without the explanation of nuances associated with time-series settings.