Matière intéressante mais trop peu détaillée. Énorme manque d'informations et de notions nécessaire pour la réalisation des exercice. Explications parfois confuses, voire déroutantes. Beaucoup de frustration....

in general, the course is good, especially the assignments which were very good but the materials like videos and slides aren't good enough, i think that there is some important details are missing

very detailed and highly efficient course to learning algorithms but some more focus should be given to solve assignment problems...as they were very tough for a average guy like me...thank you

I did gain valuable learning. Some feedback is that it can be hard to find material and some material is labeled wrong. For instance there is no week 6 labeled in the problem statement pdf.

Nick Rhodes' video sections are terrible: He stumbles, mumbles, and mis-speaks (words don't match slides). It would be fine for a live lecture, but for something pre-recorded, it's awful.

It was a good course...But the gene problem was left to be solved and on top of all please take instructors so can speak british english,It was quite difficult to understand their accent.

1 professor just did not make sense to me. do not just read out the pseudo code but instead try to visually show whats happening step by step with arrows and calculations from scratch

The course starts well but then falls especially in the dynamic programming part. The explanation should be at least comprehensible for those with an average level in mathematics.

There should be more illustrations and a more comprehensive introduction to every topic.

Discussion of a topic formally before introduction to the problems would be better.

The materials covered are not enough to fully explore the topics. Should include much more detailed explanations especially when explaining some of the complex algorithms.

The content of this course is good. The explanation in the lectures could have been better. But overall the course helped me learn some good algorithms. Thanks.

Есть множество недочётов как в субтитрах, так и в самих слайдах. Кто-то употребляет Тета, кто-то О большое, субтитры ужасны, местами перевод совершенно не тот.

it was very difficult and sometimes very frustrating to understand some of the lecturer because of their very thick accent. other than that it was good.

could not find out whats wrong with programming assignments. Atleast we should be able to see what test case we are failing. Assignments managed poorly.

It could have been better with some programming examples. It became very difficult to grasp the algorithm especially in the dynamic programming section

I find difficult to do the programming assigments without lots of extra reading and lectures from other sources. More explanation and examples needed

While it is possible to muddle through this course and retain some of it, understanding some higher math and Big O notation is pretty essential.

"The explanation of the solutions could be improved, as it is difficult to understand. Sometimes it feels like it is quite challenging for us."

Dynamic programming sections should be more decorated and contained more lectures to improve gradually and create control over this topic...

The pseudo-code is not that good to understand quickly. Please can you code in one language say C++? It will be easy to understand that way.

Some of the lectures are poorly explained, you'll need to review those 2-3 times to understand. Other than that, good course for beginners.

it would be better to change the way to submit assignment. its hard to coding in local and upload file every time to check my code.

The accent is sometimes difficult to understand. The course structure and syllabus are good but the assignments are very unclear.

This course is very useful and widens one's brain. However, I always felt there was something missing in the explanation

The best thing about this course is the assignments but the course material needs to be discussed in a better way