Learner Reviews & Feedback for Machine Design Part I by Georgia Institute of Technology
About the Course
Top reviews
The course was a concise and effective review of major concepts. The concepts were well explained and the lessons practical. I have a better understanding of fatigue failure as a result of this class.
Thank you so much. I liked your teaching style.You gave me a clear understanding about each and every topic covered in this course.I enjoyed the learning.Hope we will be in touch for further courses.
426 - 450 of 455 Reviews for Machine Design Part I
By Juan P G
•It has been very useful to recall this knowledge.
By TUSHAR C
•Its a very good course , a lot of things to learn
By Aditya R
•more example problems would have helped
By Jacob.shi
•good class，beautiful teacher
By Divyanshu K
•very informative but hard
By Priyanka F P
•A good technical course!
By shyam m s
•good explain skill
By Muhammad H
•Extraordinary
By Rohith
•madam part-ii
By K S K
•Nice Session
By Tejas
•Thank you !!
By SHARUKH A
•Great
By Deleted A
•Good
By Gokul
•Good
By Jaydeep C
•good
By Sharukhan
•good
By Zhao Z
•I love the example of Boeing and the cool video of real-world stress test. The course hour should be set higher than 11 hr, as much time is needed for self-study. Also some calculation rounds off at early stage and lead to a very different answer.
By Eric H
•Material somewhat simplistic and professor likes to "hold your hand" rather than exposing the material and letting the student run with it.
By BHUSHAN D
•Problems are not explained in depth. There were minor errors. Some points in slides were just skipped or explained with out any examples
By Sumeet M
•Very good course but if you give at least 2 attempts in 24 hours then it would be more interesting in submitting the quiz
By siva k g
•Very good 👍 subject to Mechanical engineering...we know everything
About to material
By Mohamed A E A E E
•there is lack of information , i wish it can give more information about the field
By Pouria P
•the course was good but the time between 2 exams was too long, 24 h!
By Thomas G
•Although the course content is good, it is riddled with simple errors. The teacher often uses the wrong terms for things which makes it difficult to follow. It also has very little to do with machine design, other than using a shaft as an example to calculate stresses, and should be renamed mechanics of materials.
By Колпаков Е А
•There's much to be desired. Sad that the videos still have remarks. By the was there's no feedback from the teacher only from forum. It might written that you don't need any additional knowlege, but it will happen that explanation won't be engouh. A very poor quality
Coursera Footer
