Would like more applied discussion and for it to be Longer. In particular I would like to see a discussion on class imbalance.

The content of this course is a bit too little for me.

However, it provides useful guidance for my projects. Much appreciated!

Not nearly as valuable as the first Deep Learning course. And the questions posed in the quizzes seemed far more subjective.

Programming practices with TensorFlow should have continued in this course. Unfortunately, these two weeks were all talking.

Need more quizzes, assignments to deepen the understanding, But otherwise thank you Andrew Ng for presenting this material

The pace of the first part of the course was too slow. The second part (from Transfer learning onwards) was much better.

This course does discuss interesting and important subjects but I feel it can be combined with course 2 of this series

course is very good have a lot of important theory, it will be amazing if become 3 weeks with programming assignments.

lot of issues with assignments and ambiguous quiz questions this time around, not as polished as other Andrew courses

Could have more case studies and above all. Also programing assignments on self driving car could have been better

A bit too free form compared to the other courses in deep learning specialization, but maybe that was the goal.

This course could be way more better, if it also focused on codeing with tensorflow (like the previous course)

Overview of the machine learning process. No projects or sample code to actually organize the ideas into code.

Very nice, but I don't believe the content merits a full course. It could be integrated with courses 1 and 2.

To much talk but understandable. Need something like programming examples with different data distributions.

Seemed to be information that could have been included in another course rather than its own 2 week course.

Lectures can be summed up by: "use common sense".

Quiz can be summed up by "to pass, use OUR common sense".

The quiz questions are quite confusing and some of them are not consistent with the content of the videos.

Slightly repetitive from previous courses. Could have been integrated with the future or previous course.

Filled like it could be condensed in a lot less, probably a filler to fill the 5 courses "requirement??"

More quizzes or scenario-based examples or exercises at the end in coding. This felt thin in content.

This course was shorter and didn't have any programming assignments. Could've been part of course 2.

Didn't turn out to be much useful. Could've added more content or added as a part of other courses.

Unfortunately, it did not match with my expectations, too much theory and no programming exercises.

The early part rather feels slow and repetitive. The course's content seems very important though.