Learner Reviews & Feedback for Six Sigma Tools for Define and Measure by University System of Georgia
About the Course
Top reviews
Quick and efficient presentation of material with good surface-level rules of thumb that should serve the majority of people in the majority of instances. This is very effectively delivered.
Whilst teaching conventional statistics this course showed how to utilise them from the sigma viewpoint which provided useful additional perspectives that I can take to my job now.
226 - 250 of 260 Reviews for Six Sigma Tools for Define and Measure
By Josef M J A
•Informative and organized.
By Aditi N
•Great source of learning
By jehan a
•It usfel and helpful
By Rakesh T
•Good Course to Learn
By Sridharan G
•Great Course !
By PADOLE V B
•Good course
By Sriram P
•good
By Derek T
•Useful course which provides the student with several good tools but the quality of the video lectures is poor with the lecturer having to re-read mistakes. Also, the formulation of the quiz questions (where sometimes a double negative question is asked) is not conducive to a good learner experience.
By Jorge T R
•The course doesn't provide too much information. It is based in a book you should have to follow the contents in the course. Contents are not too much developed in the videos. I miss more implication from the teachers to explain concepts and provide examples and analogies.
By VISHAL G
•The offered course is really simple and easy to understand. Having said that, I have had experienced in-depth courses on the same topic on other online course platforms at a cheaper price. So, Overall not satisfied with the value for money.
By Rasool E
•Week 2 with mathematical tests and practices was the most useful and memorable one to me. other topics were just presented briefly with little examples and therefore won't stay in mind for long.
By Kirsten K
•Was a bit harder to follow and the stats sections need updating. There were some errors in the quiz sections and the narrative on the videos could have been more engaging and descriptive.
By Tanpreet
•The content on the slides from professor Cook was not inline to what he was speaking. There were topics on the slide which were not discussed in details.
By nicolas b
•There are a lot of tools that were mentioned in this course but weren't given a proper or more in depth explanation than it should have.
By JLP
•This course does not take 4 weeks, especially if you don't have access to the reading material. 3-4h are enough to complete it.
By Shailesh K
•An e-book should have been provided and the lectures can be some better. It is not so engaging.
By Muhammad S
•you need in this part more clarifications and practical examples to make it more easier for us
By Dishank M B
•Subtitles were not matching and method of presentation can be improved
By Álvaro B D S
•Doesnt provide the textual material; the subtitles are offsync
By 时富宽
•some subscript are not in the same speed with the video.
By Dwayne S
•The statistic section should have more visual examples.
By Edmundo E
•lecture is monotonous. student cant easily drift.
By Thelma F T A
•A lot of words in the presentation.
By Mahboubeh N M
•I think more detail was required
By Erik M
•Too easy.
Coursera Footer
