Oct 02, 2017
manipulate application with multiple users is a really useful technical skills we should get, these courses contain how to add multiple users/documents/comments, that's really need to learn!
Feb 23, 2016
I really liked the course. Tha manner of teaching and the subject with all the details of "how to" are attention catchy. Unfortunately just had no time to complete it properly and in time.
By Ioannis G•
Mar 26, 2016
I would prefer if the course lasted 6 weeks so we can get a better understanding in theory and practice every single bit of the code. It was a nice ride in general and I liked it. The last exercise was hard, it could have been a little easier.
By Gonzagues J•
Feb 01, 2016
This course was too repetitive compare to the previous course in the specialization.
By Eduardo M T•
Nov 01, 2016
Course is good, the reason I'm giving it a low rating is because it's a little redundant with course 3 "Introduction to Meteor.js Development". Some of the features covered in this course I researched on my own to create the final development project in Course 3. So no much value for me here.
By Krzysztof B•
Jan 31, 2016
Review of documentation from meteorjs website.
Slow and boring course.
Last assignment is where something starts to be moving but that's the end of course :(
You could dive deep into Subscribe/Publish, what is below meteor(node.js) etc.
By Arthur K•
Feb 26, 2016
Only one assignment at the end, so you go through 3 weeks before being asked to code (this seems like a big mistake for any programming course). The final assignment gives you a largely complete project and just asks you to make a few changes. You can't put that as a project on a resume, because you're doing 5% of the work with your hand held through it.
By Arthur A F•
Jan 18, 2016
Repetitive content, like the latter course, not challenging
By Christopher B•
Jul 26, 2017
I worked very hard to overcome all of the obstacles in this module and the preceding one (Intro to Meteor). I've really enjoyed the format and instructors, but these recent modules feature a spectrum of difficulties brought on by the dated nature of the module, and a sudden disconnect between the practice material and the knowledge expected in the review exercises. Every week was another mess to dig out of without knowing how to dig or being able to find useful resources for the unique issues. Solutions were usually lucked into rather than understood. I've been a good sport about putting the work in and taking it as-is because it probably reflects some of the challenges of being in the field, but I've finally broken - why is this course such a neckache? I love it other than the pain, confusion, and random broken parts every week.
By George T•
Apr 29, 2016
Outdated course that needs a lot of changes to your code and in releases so you can follow professors code.A lot of people had same issues.