PV
Nov 21, 2019
The course was simple and crisp yet covered it all - interaction, visual and usability. Liked the duration of the videos followed by reading material that covered the highlights of the topic.
NS
Mar 16, 2016
The basic principles of design and their philosophies were covered well in this course, and it was taught in a quick, efficient manner. I liked undergoing this course and would recommend it.
By Tony F
•Nov 22, 2019
Great course
By adi0229
•Sep 3, 2017
fascinating!
By Felipe A
•Mar 11, 2016
Apasionante!
By Sandy B
•Dec 3, 2015
Great stuff!
By Mohansing P
•May 13, 2021
Nice course
By yashar k s
•Oct 4, 2016
Best Course
By Fan R
•Aug 14, 2015
非常不错的设计之初
By Cinthy P R L
•Aug 1, 2016
Awesome!
By 邢益波
•Feb 20, 2016
很好的课程,喜欢
By Manorama D
•Jul 26, 2019
awesome
By ALKESH
•Nov 1, 2018
Awesome
By Alex_G
•Mar 15, 2017
Great~
By Jingyi G
•Jan 7, 2017
great!
By Shirley S
•Apr 25, 2016
Great!
By Kevin M
•Dec 27, 2018
Great
By Albina D
•Dec 10, 2018
GREAT
By Saputra B I
•Oct 19, 2020
Good
By Yuzhifei
•Oct 31, 2018
I
By deepika j
•Sep 1, 2015
e
By Olga A
•Sep 20, 2022
Course is good, but materials should be subject of review - link to the chi-squared table has been broken, and no one replaced it for years. I see a lot of posts on forum about it without any actions from mentors. Thanks to kind people who was able to find a replacement and share it on the forum.
And, as last point, which is important - if no students in paralel with you on the course within same timeline, reviews for your submissions will be delayed, what is wrong from student perspective. It is very clear expecially for UX students. In such case deadlines should be updated automatically if submission has been done in time.
By Siddharth P S
•Sep 1, 2017
Great overview of a lot of design topics! Like Scott himself says, this is a great starting point for someone who is not a designer himself. Not sure if it is feasible, but some of the topics could be more detailed. Yes - Scott does mention books that can be referred for further reading. But if the course could include pull-outs / key chapters from those books - it could be very useful as I am not sure how many of us will get a chance to go through complete books.
Overall - loved the exposure. Especially enjoyed the part on designing experiments.
By Vazgen B
•Apr 11, 2016
This is a great course with tons of valuable info. The peer-review projects are very hands-on, and you learn a lot by doing that. However, I wish there were more explanations for certain things (for example, for the experiments section) - or at least, more resources to get further info. Also, for Assignment 3, it would have been very helpful to have the answer key, since there is some confusion around some of the answers.
By Jeff M
•Aug 22, 2017
Overall the information and exercises were good. The introduction to A/B testing was great and provides a good base layer of knowledge for the experimenting and analysis section of the IxD program. I would say that the week 3 assignment was frustrating as a grader since the rubric seemed to ask for very specific answers when the questions allowed for broader interpretation.
By Azusa W
•Oct 23, 2017
The exercises are very confusing to submit and to rate (peer rate review, sometimes too long questions and you lot the commitment). I would like that the teacher had a much linear methodology through the Specialization, in many moments it feels like he´s losing the objectivity.
It would be nice to reinforce the main concepts, instead of doing mathematic equations...
By Ryan D J
•Oct 3, 2018
The Chi Square lecture was hard to follow. I took elementary statistics in college 20 years ago and got an A, but the lecture jumped and skipped explaining things. the video seemed to have been edited when Scott was about to explain something. Sometimes he didn't really explain somethings. The other lectures were very helpful and have helped me already.