If you want to learn cybersecurity and you have no idea about that. Then this is the best course which covers all the basic topics and provide you a best knowledge about cybersecurity and their tools.
The reading link to Week 03's Framework and their purpose is Broken. Please Fix it. Everything else seemed perfect. I would recommend this course for people who think of starting their careers in CyS.
By Andre H
•Horrible audio on many of the courses.
By Faaiz K
•Instructors voice not clear sometimes
By SynackTest2
•Over all good but for beginers only
By Sameer M A
•some of the Records are not clear,
By Dhruv J
•sound is not clear in some lecture
By MOHIT G
•increase your audio quality please
By Mari A
•There were bad quality of lessons
By Galab A
•Videos are very poor in quality!
By Donald R M
•Did lost in some of the acronyms
By Rubén B
•Poor video and audio quality
By André d S F
•Many topics are redundant.
By Aisha M
•bad voice & video quality
By Ajith N
•t
h
e
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
By Gokulnath S
•Poor audio quality...
By Rawan
•Sound quality is bad
By C. G R F
•less audio quality
By jeswin d
•Theory based
By Jejhar S
•informartove
By Aman s
•not so good
By Pratima R
•GOOD...
By hansa p
•NIce
By Dhruv R G
•ok
By Helen B
•I was disappointed to see how little effort was put in to design this course. I was expecting more since this course seemed to get a decent rating based on Coursera user feedback. The course provides some very helpful resources to go back to later when learning more about cybersecurity and keeping up with the most up to date news and research. The course attempts to teach important concepts, but the lecture delivery method is just poor.
For starters, the video lecture designs were just sloppy -- poor audio recordings, typos on the slides and in the written transcripts, slide graphics were not visible most of the time (even when viewing in full-screen mode). Many acronyms and terms were not clearly defined or defined at all. This should be a number 1 priority for a beginners' course. The written transcripts for each of the lecture slide simply just transcribed the audio and did not correct any transcription mistakes when they appeared. There should also be helpful written guides creating outlines for each of the units and the terms/concepts presented.
This course has a 7-day free trial, but I canceled before the trial was over. It is not worth paying for something where there is clearly very little effort put into making the course.
Overall disappointed because I expected more from IBM since they have top experts in this field.
By Aaron W
•I signed up for the 7 Day Free Trail for the IBM Cyber-security Analyst Professional Certificate. This is definitely a cert I would be interested in completing but unfortunately the lecture audio is so bad that I will have to un-enrollment as I can't justify shelling out $49 per month for such terrible and unclear audio quality and instructors. The material itself seems interesting but I literally cannot hear or understand 75% of what the presenter is trying to say in the lectures. I tried turning on the subtitles but that's just no way to learn... Unfortunate because I think this certification path has potential but I could literally create a YouTube video on my $300 laptop with no special equipment that would sound better than what IBM is putting out here. I bought a Security+ course on Udemy for $9.99 and it seems to basically have all the same type of material plus the lecture audio / instructor is clear and concise in their presentation.
By James M A
•With an IT course, (especially from IBM) I believe the quality of production such as audio and video should be top notch. In many of the presentations, the audio sounds like it is in a hallway or in the background. Very poor audio. A cheap dedicated microphone would solve this issue and sound more professional. I expect more from IBM. Also, it seems the terminology is all over the place and the lessons don't seem to have any order to them. Many of the speakers' English skills were not at a native level, so sometimes it was difficult to pick up on the technical jargon. I am an ESL teacher and I welcome multilingual individuals, but with a professional course, I believe this should be done by native English speakers. If this course was for Spanish learners, I would expect a native Spanish instructor for ease of learning. I feel I didn't learn much with this course.