The assignments are tedious for no reason, the automated grading system is very badly optimized, made me spend too much time looking after capitalization and spacing in print commands even though the code was running perfectly fine as intended, there are many mistakes in the assignments and too many vague commands.

I see multiple improvement areas such as : The content is fast paced. And the Graded Assignments lacks proper guidelines. There is no proper support. Sometimes it felt frustrating as I was unable to complete some of the assignments. Many of the videos doesn't have subtitles. Missing resource link / image even though the instructor explicitly mentioned about it.

There are several issues with this course. Within Module 1 alone, there are inconsistent quiz responses. For instance, there were two questions with answers that contradicted each other. One claimed an interface can have concrete methods, while the other claimed it could not. Additionally, when submitting the final lab there were compile time errors for not having overloaded constructors in subclasses to match the parent class. The instructions neither implicitly or explicitly asked for these constructors to exist. Instruction for such a graded assignment should be clearly communicated to the user. Overall, module 1 is also extremely repetitive content that barely deviates from the first course in this series, which already taught abstract classes and interfaces. Can't wait to power through the next modules where I will be learning something completely new and there are errors to be found!

Si pudiera le pondría 2.5 estrellas. No es un mal curso, al contrario, creo que la información es muy útil y las prácticas son didácticas, sin embargo, la forma de evaluar de las prácticas es horrible, me pasó que en una práctica de laboratorio calificada utilicé atributos privados con getters y setters, pero el sistema al parecer quería que todos los atributos estuvieran públicos y determinó que mi calificación era de 0% en dicha práctica (aunque todo funcionaba correctamente), tuve que cambiar todos los modificadores de acceso y eliminar todos los getters y setters para sacar el 100. En las evaluaciones de selección múltiple existen algunas preguntas que se contradicen, no siempre especifican para qué versión de Java estamos hablando (me refiero a las preguntas sobre interfaces). A pesar de todo esto, reforcé bastante mis conocimientos de OOP con Java, además de implementar correctamente la herencia, clases abstractas, interfaces, manejo de excepciones y validaciones, archivos, etc. Es un curso con buena información pero una pobre manera de evaluar, pero comprendo que es reciente y espero que puedan mejorar esos detalles para que la experiencia del estudiante sea más amigable.

Un curso monótono en su estructura y herramientas de aprendizaje. Quedé vacunado contra el mínimo interés de volver a cursar algo como esto. Ejemplos fuera de la realidad. No lo recomiendo para nada.

The course content is too basic, and when you have problems with the Graded Labs, technical support just redirects you to an Artificial Intelligence Assistant that does NOT help you at all.

trash lag

very complete and didactic in multiple formats, visual, audio, reading and practice. Som labs need corrections but still doable and educative

Very recommended this course if are beginner in java, it gives you an approach to perform jobs in a real environment.

Best course for Java. Covering both fundamentals and advanced concepts with hands-on practice in lab assignments.

muito explicativo, poderia ter mais conteudo, atividades mas esta de bom tamanho

Nice Course , explained Clearly with Hands on Lab for practical experience!

Though course, but good

Amazing!

good

This is a deeply insightful course, unlike many other tutorials or courses on Java. Important concepts were thoroughly covered, such as serialization and exception handling. While these are not "fun" topics, it's what makes a good developer different from others. Minus 1 star is because the quizzes are designed overly complex and didn't serve a good purpose. Please improve it.

The Course was very well structured but i found a lot of inconsistencies in the videos and notes, even while solving labs i found a couple of errors and a gap between the task lists and the starter code , though these were rare it was annoying sometimes.

Some of the lab solutions utilize code that hasn't been taught up to this point. Also some of the lab instructions feel unclear or are missing steps.

Several questions are incorrect for answer.

thanks good information