Learner Reviews & Feedback for Agile Software Development by University of Minnesota

good

Good

good

Good

done

good

Good

good

Good

good

good

,.

G

g

.

G

I

Content was relevant. It could have been delivered in a more varied and engaging way. Different subject matter experts presenting on different topics. Accent very difficult to understand at times. Some of the assessment exercises focused on content that was barely covered while key elements seemed to get minimal focus at times. The level of plagiarism and copying evident in some of the peer-reviewed work was concerning.

I have taken the two start out due to the issues of assignment and grading. For the online course, assignment and peer grading may not be the best options and if the university re-look that aspects and stick to the online quizes to certify then it makes a great experience. Course content is good.

For an intermediate course I found the info too easy and lightweight. The longer the course takes the more it got fragmented and the host seems to loose enthusiasm over time. Videos snippets always follow same pattern.

The course was ok but the Peer Review assignment was very detailedly asked which was not that detailed in the Course videos

The course could be more interactive with input from the learner during the lectures

Good with Basic Concept

super

good