This was mostly review for me though probability especially Beyes Theorem derivation was new. The instructors provided clear often refreshing ways to look at material.\n\nThank you for a great class!!
This course syllabus is great. It starts wonderfully. Week 1 to 4 is taught by Paul Bendich, and Daniel Egger the instruction is awesome. Effective way to refresh and add the Data Science math skills!
By Esaú C•
t's a good review for the people that know something but will be very hard for students that don't have a background in Maths
By Vaibhav J•
Found the title of the course mis-leading! School level Math skills are taught. Found the title to be similar to "click-baits"
By Hubert W A E•
It was too short, I think they must add additional mathematics course to make this program complete for Data Science needs
By Xose C•
You'd spend lots of time checking other sources as they do not explain things in detail. They assume many things.
By Peter G•
I enjoyed the first 2 weeks. Weeks 3 and 4 were harder to follow. Too few examples, particularly in week 4.
By Andersson F R A•
A pesar de que el curso es básico, la parte de probabilidad no está muy bien explicada.
By Nayaung L•
The last probability course is really horrible It should be changed or make it easier.
By vivek a•
The course name should be Bais Mathematics instead of Data Science Maths Skills.
By PRASAD K•
Concepts from Probability up to Bayes' Theorem could have been explained better
By Saurabh S•
Week 1 and week 2 are good. rest of the weeks are very fast and not clear.
By Jonathan H•
Very basic course... probably won't teach you a lot of new things
Wish there will be more example question in the lectures
By A M A•
Probability part is good others are elementary math
By Rodrigue S•
This is really basic basic.
By Derek S•
last week was very hard
It's nice to learn
By Stan M•
By Eray C•
With all due respect but this was honestly the worst paid education-experience I've EVER had in my whole life! What is this?
Okay let's summarize the problems:
First of all. This course does NOT provide any useful math skills. No, in the first 3 courses, you learn a tiny piece of minimum basics of college math.
And then comes week 4....... what.. is... this... why.. Any note written on the screen looks like the drafts of college times, where we had no pleasure to even write.
It's totally hard to even understand what is being "explained" nor to even READ what is being written! It's a total loss of time and money. The only thing worth in this course is the title of the course, written on the certificate. But there absolutely NO quality behind it! I'm honestly disappointed.
Half of the quiz-questions are very misleading because of lacking a proper, clear and distinctive use of language (is this math or not???)!! The theory PDFs are okay at the beginning then get worse with each week. There is such a lack of clarity proper explanation!
please just delete this course.
PS: it seems, the discussion forum is not even touched by providers. Why? There are a ton of suggestions to improve the course. I mean... there WERE... if someone would read them to actually improve the course.
PPS: And HOW did this course get 4.5 Stars?? Makes no sense to me.
By John Z•
This course was pure garbage. Though it seemed promising in the beginning, it was clearly too ambitious and poorly designed. The topics are too quickly covered, and don't build upon each other. It's a very disconnected learning experience. The probability modules are completely useless. The "instructor" just read some definitions and sloppily wrote some formulas on a virtual whiteboard. Though I appreciate the exposure to a wide array of topics, my time would have been better spent reading a book on the same concepts - an exercise I will inevitably now have to do.
By Katrina E•
I chose this course because it said it was for beginners but the content was extremely difficult and was not at a beginner level at all. The presenter assumed knowledge and the presenter himself made errors during his presentation and did not explain concepts well. The quiz was very difficult to attempt because the questions often went beyond what was in the course. Do not attempt this course if you do not have actuarial science level.
By Mahdi S•
I expected much much much more than what I was exposed to in this course. The video companions could be more detailed, having more examples (I believe math is learnt via examples) and the lectures, especially in the third and fourth weeks were amazingly disengaging.
By Krishnachandran R•
Please give the certificate sir.
Why didn't i get certificate? I have tried a lot to get this one, i have lost sleep for many nights. Im coming from a poor family. I dont have enough money with me. If i get this certificate it will help for my career.
Help me sir..
By Fernando M M E•
I think this is not the best course to start with for the data science learning path. The first half was maybe too easy and the second half was hard and confusing. It's discouraging for a person who is just starting with data science.
By Sitalakshmi I•
The course was not properly taught. There should have been more quizzes, more systemic approach to explaining the problems and solutions. Also the feedback after exams and quizzes were non existent
By Ranjan B•
The course provides very basics concepts of Mathematics and Statistics.This course would help those who needs fundamental acquaintance with basic theorems of Mathematics and Statistics.