Learner Reviews & Feedback for Exploratory Data Analysis by Johns Hopkins University
About the Course
Top reviews
This is the second course I have taken from Roger Peng and both were outstanding. I have a strong math background, but not much of a background in stats, but this course was very approachable for me.
Very good course! It provide me the foundation in learning how to plot and interpret data. This will definitely strengthen my "R programming" to generate publication type figure for my genomics data!
801 - 812 of 812 Reviews for Exploratory Data Analysis
By Dmitry R
•some swirl tests (4,5) don't work because of parameter method in qplot function. This parameter is not realy existed in this function now
By Freddie K
•Quite repetitious in covering basic graphing, and very shallow in regards of clustering, SVD and PCA.
By Tamaz L
•Very unprofessional, compared to other courses. It wasn't well organized.
By Desmond W
•About plotting in R. Not about generating real insights from EDA.
By Esther L
•Too weak regarding the clustering methods, very disappointed.
By ewa b
•didnt get much useful-- a whole "course" on plotting? meh.
By Vineet P
•Not upto expectations
By Michal K
•too superficial
By Piyush V
•Veyr boring
By Christy P
•How can you have a course on Graphic Devices and not show one screen shot of a graphic or open R to show how to perform the ideas around this topic?
By Nicholas
•NEEEEEED TO EDIT MY PEER REVIEW FROM OTHERS
By Carsten J
•Material is to basic for an entire course.
Coursera Footer
