The assessments were excellent. Initially, I did have hesitation in getting started, but got hooked to the assessments. Thank you to Kavya and Steve, our Program Managers who encouraged us everyday.
complete view of the businesses related to each type, separated into different sections, but with a clear explanations that the different types are interlinked into a bigger picture
By Shikha C•
Content of the course is really genaeral and very less also. There should b in depth knowlegde of each topic. But the topics are very well synchronized.
By Abdulrahman A•
there is alot of missing content such as unavailable websites and some of then needs subscription also the translation is always earlier 0.5 seconds
By Tor H•
Found the questions slightly basic, and some are less relevant as they only check if you have paid attention and not really check your understanding
By Anirudh G I•
The quizzes are flawed and the language isn't entirely accurate. Course instructors need to improve this course on a priority basis.
By Evanthia S•
Links to few resources (articles, videos) were not functioning and responses to tests were not mentioned in the training videos.
By Neeraj B•
While the course content is good, some videos end abruptly. Plus there is less teaching and more stuff to read from the internet
By Senthil K A•
More complicated questions. Few questions we couldt find answer even though we attempt many times with all alternatives.
Just scratch the surface. In many cases, the articles selected are just opinions and not fact/research based.
By Rakibul H•
The course is good but quite backdated for me. Some of the links doesn't work. This course need to updated.
By Lewis D•
Some of the material and videos linked to as part of the course were not of a high 'academic' standard.
By BRYAN R P C•
El curso estuvo muy bueno, sin embargo deberían realizar ejercicios prácticos más que solo teoría.
By deepak k m•
outdated information and some links are not opening ,interaction should also be there
By Andrea G•
I like it but: some links are not working. too many reading and too little lesson.
By SYED D H N•
good course. would have been more attractive if material was presented in videos
By Pelin C I•
Level is much lower than expected. Teacher is not engaging. I do not recommend.
By Suresh R•
Lectures are good however would have enjoyed more with a better acce
By Dusan T•
It would be rated better if there was no annoying Module 4 test.
By Yash A•
Assignment 4 was not at all upto the mark.
By Tomas M•
Good base ground. Need fintech updates
By Vinay V D•
to add more videos and case studies
By Daniel N•
Some links for reading didnt work
too much of text reading
By Jay K J•
By Maarten K•
Interesting contents, good introduction.
First two chapters are quite alright. Later modules have received less attention from the makers. The readings often consist of references to Wikipedia pages and magazine articles (which are missing some depth and sometimes require registration). I found that one video transcript resembled the Wikipedia page about that topic a lot...
Some video's stop before the lecturer has stopped speaking...
It doesn't seem like the course is being updated as there are a number of broken links (preventing of hindering you to pass assessments). Assessment questions could be better as there is too much room for interpretation.
A lot of participants have complained about the assessments in the discussion forums, but no reaction from moderators for years. If you want a certificate for this course, prepare to be frustrated!
By Christian L•
The content was okay, but there were several points, I did not like about the course. As a summary, much less professional than other courses.
1) There were many references to public sources like youtube or wikipedia - the reason for subscribing here is just to learn more than from these public sources.
2) In the video, there not much good visualisation to support the presentation (e.g. no or small graphics)
3) The editing of the videos is not always good, a couple of times, the video is just cut off in the end.
4) The Danish professor was not always easy to unterstand.
5) In the quizzes, it was not always clear how to answer (e.g. the answer consisted of three words which had to be given separated by comma, but there was no hint how to do it, so you had to try & error)