I was really happy because I could learn deep learning from Andrew Ng.\n\nThe lectures were fantastic and amazing.\n\nI was able to catch really important concepts of sequence models.\n\nThanks a lot!
The course is very good and has taught me the all the important concepts required to build a sequence model. The assignments are also very neatly and precisely designed for the real world application.
By Sergei S•
Feels again like authors tried to put everything into just a couple of weeks, thus the course turned out to be messy with lots of details hidden. Even though there was a lot to learn, I am still not sure if I understand correctly how to build a simple sequence model.
By Clement A•
Really good to understand the basics, however, it doesn't use the latest TF2 and the exercises are either trivial because too much pre-worked, or too hard because it doesn't give the information required to succeed.
This course really needs to be updated.
By Mladen M•
Programming assignment instructions are not well written (clear), and as a result it is easy to get stuck on something of little relevance to deep learning. Also, I would suggest that you make the lecture notes in written format available.
By Chris M•
The lectures cover the basic design of the models but don't help teaching you how to actually use them. I learned more by reading blogs to get the programming assignments to work then this course.
By Ashley H•
Lectures/Videos were excellent, the assignments were very poor (loads of errors in the code not corrected over 7 months since the course went live)
The course videos were very lengthy and difficult to follow. Many topics discussed in course video were not part of programming assignment
By Simeon S•
Good introduction to the concepts. Really poor quality videos and exercises. Very frustrating when working on the assignments.
By David L•
Good lectures. Programming assignments are useless fill-in-the-blank exercises, you don't really learn much from them.
By Thomas A•
The programming assignments really are like pulling teeth. There's not really enough guidance leading up to them.
By Siddharth S•
The transformer subclass programming exercise is super useless task. Spent hours on this task and learnt nothing.
The course videos and the programming assignments were lacking. And there was no support in the forums.
By Jeffrey S•
Spent more time trying to work around a buggy grader than learning the underlying concepts.
By ZHANPENG T•
Too hard to understand compared to the previous coursed in this specification.
By Hamid A•
Was very difficult. please add more expiation of mathematical equations.
Little unsatisfied with the final part of the specialization.
By Arsh K•
Lack of Keras training made it often hard to do layer code.
By Tom T•
This course needs more instruction on Keras.
By Mark N•
Poor explanation for alot of things
By Milica M•
boring and uninformative
By João P B D•
By Martin B•
By Alex L•
I feel sad.
By Aldiyar K•
Oversimplifying material, such as not showing any math foundations and proofs, does not lead to an intrinsic understanding of the material as well as fill-the-gap assignments do not enhance comprehension.
I understand that the course is intended for the broad audience but will one be able to implement those Keras and TensorFlow algorithms on a moderately complex problem, which is the ultimate goal of these courses? Highly doubt it because the code is pre-written for students and step-by-step guide is provided. In my opinion, one could go straight to assignments and induct / deduct the answers.
By Venkata D R S•
I love Dr. Andrew, I seriously do. He has inspired me in the field of Deep Learning like no one else did. But I detest how this course is made so expensive and in a wrong direction. I subscribed and paid $225 and I still was not given a decent amount of time to finish the course, even when I asked for extension. If this is the way these courses are, its better of learning from youtube. It is not worth the money