The course is very good and has taught me the all the important concepts required to build a sequence model. The assignments are also very neatly and precisely designed for the real world application.
Loved the course - it was very interesting. It is also pretty complex, so will probably go through it again to review the concepts and how the models work. Thank you for this wonderful course series!
By Matias A•
Worst course of the specialization, content is interesting and Andrew keeps explaining really well but programming assignments are clearly of a lower quality
By Max W•
The course is great but the tasks in Keras are too complex without background knowledge. Therefore, a reasonable introduction in Keras would be desirable.
By Eymard P•
Far less detailed than the other ones. The programming assignements are less interesting too, as a great part of the work consist of reading documentation
By Reetu H•
There were lot of bugs in the assignments taking up lot of time to fix. The course was okay, I liked the other courses in the specialization more.
By Kaupo V•
The Keras programming exercises are quite weak. Please re-think how to teach them more systematically. Currently it is quite a lot of hit and miss.
By Prut S•
The lectures were great, but the programming assignments could have been structured better, especially the final assignment which drove me nuts.
By Assa E•
That was much harder than the previous courses of the specialization. However it felt like the videos are more hasty and less understoodable
By Leandro A•
There was a bug in a programming assignment notebook that took too much time to notice that i was doing ok but the expected ouptut was wrong
By David H P•
The programming assignments required some extra effort to understand Keras which I thought may need an introduction video like tensorflow.
By Iván V P•
Several grader issues, only 3 weeks of work, and a lot of errors in the solutions... In addition, less content than in the other courses...
By Rishabh G•
The earlier courses were easy to understand, however, this was way too difficult. Andrew Ng did not make this easy like the other courses.
By H Y•
Compared with previous courses, this one seems to be rushed. The focus on applications seems to be much higher than the theoretic side.
By Yash R S•
Not as great as the other courses in the specialisation. The assignments can be a little off putting, but lectures are top class again.
By Roberto S•
Week 1 took double time to be completed. Times proposed for the assingnement are underestimated.
Please readjust the assingement time.
By Ankit S•
Assignments are not up t the mark.. Expected to have high vocabulary size word embedding assignment, Machine Translation assignments
By Nachiketa M•
This course was good but in comparison to the other courses in the deeplearning course series, this course lacked adequate depth.
The course is a good course because the lecture Ng.W ,but the exercises is not easy for our beginers for such tools like kears.
By Seng P T P P•
The programming assignments in this course are difficult to implement. The detail descriptions are needed inside the notebooks.
By Thomas N•
Good subject, but a lot of the course material (like lecture slides and problem sets) was either unavailable or out of date.
By Vinjosh V•
The videos are great - however it would be useful to provide some help on how to implement the concepts programatically.
By shreya g•
The assignments need better instructions and there is a huge jump in complexity when going from lectures to assignments.
By Søren M•
Not as good as the previous courses in the series, and some of the assignments where broken, and super hard to debug.
By Laurent B•
Only on NLP applications, it would have been great to apply GRU or LSTM on numerical data like finance for example.
By Devansh K•
The content covered is interesting, but I feel like the explanations are not as intuitive as the previous 4 courses
By Sandeep P•
Nice but little stressful. After completing 5 courses in a row, really feeling exhausted. Thanks for the good work.