The course is very good and has taught me the all the important concepts required to build a sequence model. The assignments are also very neatly and precisely designed for the real world application.
Learnt a lot about new concepts in RNN and LSTM. Really wanted to learn about these models. This course helped a lot. Everything was new and so fascinating. Loved this course and our teach Andrew NG.
By Søren M•
Not as good as the previous courses in the series, and some of the assignments where broken, and super hard to debug.
By Laurent B•
Only on NLP applications, it would have been great to apply GRU or LSTM on numerical data like finance for example.
By Devansh K•
The content covered is interesting, but I feel like the explanations are not as intuitive as the previous 4 courses
By Sandeep P•
Nice but little stressful. After completing 5 courses in a row, really feeling exhausted. Thanks for the good work.
By Rudolf S•
Quite a lot of bugs in the first week examples. It took me too much time until I browsed the discussion forums.
By SHALEEN A•
the videos are programming assignments need some serious updates, too many typos and wrong information present
By Maysa M G d M•
I think you have to know more keras than is explained in the course. The keras documentation it is not enough.
By Raghav G•
An average course, it is detailed though some of the ending materials get too difficult for me to comprehend.
By Mikey K•
Assignments are very buggy and instructions misleading or incomplete. However the core material is excellent
By PANKAJ R•
Require a little depth, considering the complexibility. At least 4 Week course should be their instead of 3
By Gargi V•
There were a lot of issues with the notebook especially, for the week 3. The concepts were well explained.
By Mikko L•
Would have required more of the "intuition" building material. Worst of the 5 course series, but still ok!
By Shengyu H•
Contents are way too easy and the video recordings are often a bit broken (repetition, blank audio, etc.)
By Alexander B•
incredibly boring. I mean at some task you literally asked to type in "= False" instead "= None". Really?
By Jinxi W•
There are some mistakes need to be correct in the assignments. Still a lot of improvements can be made.
By Yao G•
The assignments should be improved. More prep on Keras will help improve the efficiency of learning.
By Kabakov B•
The practical tasks is bad. You are simply needed to rewrite formulas to python most of the time.
By Benoit D F•
Very interesting topic but coding exercices and quizzes were a bit clunky and in need for ironing
By Andrei M•
The content is super interesting, but the assignments are more of the same 'fill in the blank'.
By Lars O A•
Put to much focus into getting the Keras code to work instead of truly learning the algorithms.
By Nagaraj R•
I found this very hard to follow along. The concepts were too heavy and needs a slower pace.
By Anmol D•
Theory explained in a better way, but practicals could have been more involved and better.
By Sidharth S•
Really Nice course. Could have been more fun if Keras and it's functioning had more focus.
By Uttam R•
Course is got but grader compilations are horrible spent more time on them than the course
By Juan I G P•
Not as good as structured in explanation nor in programming assigments as the last ones.