Learner Reviews & Feedback for Software Development Processes and Methodologies by University of Minnesota
About the Course
Top reviews
Very nice course that provides good insight on software development practices and common problems. It provides also some insights on project management, highlighting pros and cons of different models.
I really enjoyed the course and learned many new things that i was not aware about. The instructors were helpful and easy to understand. Peer review assignments were very interesting to me. Thank you.
251 - 269 of 269 Reviews for Software Development Processes and Methodologies
By Aniket D
•thank you so much
By DALAWAI S M
•very nice course
By ishaan o
•excellent cource
By Mayank r
•Nice Content
By SIBHI H V S 1
•N
i
c
e
By Tejaswini V
•Good
By ADDANKI V V S P
•course is good actually, but the main problem is plagiarism issues, which is so terrific. i submit my works doing for my self , but i still get the issues of error. i don't know why this system was failed in detecting the real work vs copied work
By Trần H Đ N
•A good enough course. Material are sometimes difficult to follow. Assignment are quite different from what were being taught.
By Avanti M D
•Course is good. But it lags in detailed description. Slide presentation is not explained in detail.
By Alpish J
•It could have been better.But it was better than what my college taught.
By ILYA S
•Very repetitive and not detailed enough.
By Sandhya P
•Nice
By Sofiia R
•I didn't find the specialization and this course in particular useful. It has low quality videos, unstructured information, and doesn't give enough knowledge to start working.
Also, the last course of the specialization requires background in programming, otherwise you will not be able to complete the specialization.
By Hussein A
•There was a lot of overlap on the videos in fact the incremental model video had the dictation of the wrong video. Someone who primarily relys in text to study the dictations were extremely frustrating at the minimum it should be broken into paragraphs
By Marcelo H G
•Confuse, lack important details. Peer review strangely setup. Testing covered in OK way but lacks any kind of real world examples, practices or code.
By sai p
•good
By Stella v d E
•Quite disappointed in the quality of the course. The staff did not reply to comments in the discussion forum, there was no syllabus, at one point even links to youtube instead of creating their own content, and the quality of the assessments (especially the peer review ones) were quite poor. One criteria for a good rank was to write a "creative" story. Overall this course is nothing I would pay for.
By Deleted A
•to bad the grading was not done still for one month .rating also waste for this course. my rating 0.00000000
many 0's
By GOPI K Y
•week 3 and 4 assignment is not opening and submitting
Coursera Footer
