Learner Reviews & Feedback for Statistical Inference by Johns Hopkins University
About the Course
Top reviews
Course is compressed with lots of statistical concepts. Which is very good as most must know concepts are imparted. Lots of extra reading is required to gain all insights. Very good motivating start .
the teachers were awesome in this course. I liked this course a lot.Understood it properly.Thanks to all the beloved teachers and mentors who toiled hard to make these course easy to handle.Gracious!
776 - 800 of 812 Reviews for Statistical Inference
By Marco A M A
•poor course, saturated, with an instructer that uses big words and does not explain many difficult ideas, and take for granted that the leaner knows a lot of probability and statistics.
By Evgeny P
•Course materials are not balanced, it is not enough information to follow conclusions. Course gives set of tools but doesn't build solid foundation and intuition about how to use them.
By vaibhav p
•Quality of teaching needs to improve. The professor needs to be more enthusiastic when giving the lecture.
The course content should involve more examples to help cement the concepts.
By Adnan B
•Not a good instructor or course material
it felt like if he was trying to teach to phd candidates
I just went to Khans academy for every topic.. didnt learny anything from him..
By Rennê L C V
•The teatcher know so much about the topic that he can't put himself on students shoes and see that his classes are really hard to understand. Also, the audio was pretty bad.
By Sergey Z
•The worst course I've ever taken.
Bad sound quality, dead discussion forums, not possible to understand material without external (not mentioned in the course) sources.
By Farhad S
•This course is very difficult to follow, not because the topics are hard or too technical but mostly due to lecturer's poor job in explaining and creating a narrative.
By Martin L
•It's a very interesting topic but I had to rely on a text book to understand it! I struggled to understand the lectures and reconcile it back to the quizes.
By Maria
•The teacher does not explain clearly the concepts. I will not recommend this course to somebody interested in the subject as it is not effective to learn.
By Jeff B
•The lecturer is very difficult to follow. His teaching style is very hard if you don't already have a background in statistics. Sorry but true.
By Heather D
•Basics of statistics are not covered. Teacher jumped into more advanced material. I must use many outside resources to actually learn this.
By Abdelrahman S H
•The content of this is mainly theoretical, and the practical part is so small compared to other courses in the same specialization.
By Grigory S
•T
h
e
l
e
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
r
e
v
e
r
y
t
h
e
o
r
e
t
i
c
w
i
t
h
a
f
e
w
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
s
.
T
h
e
o
n
l
y
w
a
y
I
c
o
u
l
d
f
i
n
i
s
h
u
p
t
h
e
c
o
u
r
s
e and understand the
By Neeraj K
•Very bad teacher. He seems in a hurry. Not explaining anything clearly.
Through out the idiot wasting time and money
By Guan C
•Didn't explain things clearly, the companion book uses many inconsistent mathematical symbols which confuses me.
By Imogen S
•Not a very well-structured subject. Need to make clearer demonstrations and explanations on the theories.
By sateesh
•The course is very difficult to comprehend..Moreover the examplanations given ar not concise and brief..
By Ravi T B
•No proper meaningful explanation for the logic derived, especially in Probability, the core of stats.
By Tony W
•Not explained well, had to take another statistical inference course. Not worth the money.
By Charly A
•The instructor is about as convoluted as you can possibly get with his explanations.
By Seyed M
•The slides are very difficult to follow. It could be better designed
By Aarohi V
•At last no proper instruction given about how to complete the task.
By Christian
•poor course material / slides makes it hard to follow...
By Cady
•Too theoretical. Could not see practical applications.
By Bijan S
•super boring instruction, instructor is like a robot!
Coursera Footer
