It was interesting but later i found it boring .But it was a good experience.

Walton sir you were very good.Thank you for giving this class.

First part is quite intresting, but then lectures are too long and repetitive. I suppose previous course was much better.

One of the questions I got wrong on the final quiz suggest all birds fly as a correct answer, wrong ALL BIRDS do not fly.

This course was a struggle for me. The quizzes were sometimes hard to follow when it came to breaking down arguments

The course is overly theoretical with little real world application. This is the reason I lost interest.

Videos cut off before the end and would instantly start replaying from the beginning

I am not too fond of the examples used

A lot of "okays?' Interesting class

A bit boring, sometimes confusing.

Pretty heavy on the linguistics

This was a strange course.

Somewhat outdated videos.

No es lo que esperaba

Super

I learned a lot about arguments. However, I feel that it was at times very confusing and difficult to understand. There was not enough practice to learn how to apply the theories and concepts of arguments. It was as difficult as taking a Math course without tools for practicing the problems of the concepts and theories. Also, the instructors should refer to other Cousera MOOCs that make learning material easy to recall and fun such as Mindshift (from McMaster University) ; Learning How to Learn (from several partners); Positive Psychology: Resilience Skills (from the University of Pennsylvania); Psychological First Aid (from Johns Hopkins University); and the Science of Success (from the University of Michigan). The professors who teach these courses make it so easy to understand the material and remember it. I have even gone back to review these courses and recommended them to my family members. I will not recommend this course. This MOOC was the first MOOC that I had problems with. I had to take the final quiz more than once in other to pass it. The presentation of the material needs to be improved. This explains why lots of people are not taking the course.

Not what I was expecting at all... Rather than being called "How to understand arguments" this should be called "How to understand what IS an argument and what parts it is made of. This "course is very theoretical and doesn't really explain how to spot fallacies, shortcuts etc, or how to construct a good, clear argument, which is what I expected from this course. So maybe I just took the wrong class, but to be honest I am disappointed with the time spent and what I've actually learnt.

In my view, this Course is meaningless. I could pass the final test after completing 1,5 weeks instead of 4. I still can't understand which is the aim of this program. Nevertheless, the teacher is very smart.

So difficult. why it has been developed, when persons are not getting achieving it? the course should be not so difficult either not too easy.

Curriculum design did not meet expectation. Lectures too long and taking a test after each lecture became tedious.

This course should be named (Think again : How to use logical fallacies).

It is full with logical fallacies.

The videos were too long and boring

It felt boring and biaised.

no need

.