Excellent course materials, especially the videos, with content that is thoughtfully composed and carefully edited. Very good python training, great instructors, and overall great learning experience.
Great course to learn the basics! The supplementary material in Jupyter notebooks is extremely valuable. Really appreciate the PhD students who took the time to explain even the simplest of codes :)
By Vikram J•
Very long videos, even the simplest concept is explained in a slower manner. But this is true for me and a lot might benefit from this pace.
By Rakesh D•
Lectures are boring and very long it should be more practical ,but yes I've gain certain statistical insights.
By Vignesh R•
Python in week 2 is largely unexplained, also course could have dived deeper into statistics
By Leonardo S•
Good content and syllabus, though the later videos could be easier to follow.
By Ayush Z•
I think it was more theoretical and more practice is required.
By Navavat P•
Too many texts in the lectures
By Djon P•
A little easy, and lacks focus
Could be more refined.
By Yu J K•
phyton part is shit
By Nikita K•
Basic statistics explanations are good, especially for those uninitiated. Examples that require intuitive understanding of plots are nice, albeit slightly confusing.
A lot of material concerning Python is not covered in the course, however. No possibility to download source files and work with them in your own environment. Ambiguous instructions that relate to statistical concepts that are still unknown and lots of materials that require 3rd party explanations. This extends the learning time 4-5 fold.
Extremely long weeks with lots of technical and incomplete materials. Breaking things into smaller chunks would have made a world of difference.
By Jared K•
Had a hard time keeping my attention. Very lecture heavy. In fact, astoundingly lecture heavy. This course should have gone between the jupyter notebooks and the video content to keep the viewer engaged. Why not leverage python and jupyter to teach concepts as the student follows along instead of just lecturing for hours? Keep the students engaged through hands-on work instead of just talking at them for hours. The structure is simply antiquated for the modern student.
By Leonardo J B d A•
The statistics material is extremely superficial and naive to anyone with high school level of statistics. On the other hand, the Python lessons are extremely difficult, going directly to complex tasks with no explanation of the intermediate skills required to understand what is being taught. This is the case even if the course description says only a basic level of Python knowledge would suffice to follow the course. I don't see how this course could be useful to anyone.
By VENIGALLA N S V J•
My final course certificate not received, even after completing all 3 courses.
By Sakir I•
didn't learn anything
By Henry C H T•