Learner Reviews & Feedback for Applied Text Mining in Python by University of Michigan
About the Course
Top reviews
BK
May 3, 2019
Lectures are very good with a perfect explanation. More than lectures I liked the assignment questions. They are worth doing. You will get to know the basic foundation of text mining. :-)
RK
Jul 19, 2019
Course is great except for the auto grader issues. Please look into the issue. I would like to take this opportunity and thank Prof V. G. Vinod Vydiswaran and all those who helped me to complete it.
626 - 650 of 746 Reviews for Applied Text Mining in Python
By Thomas B
•Apr 22, 2018
Some rather vague assignments instructions, some assignments require material only briefly mentioned in lectures
By Devmallya B
•Apr 30, 2020
It was not well designed. The explanations were not adequate. It was more theoretical with practical aspects.
By Mile D
•Nov 23, 2017
This course was quit ok. I have expected just more exercises and explanations because of the difficult topic.
By Rishi S .
•Dec 26, 2020
The content was not covered in depth. Theoretical concepts were very less as compared to the other courses.
By Thomas H
•May 2, 2021
Unlike the other courses in this series there were no practice applications which lessened the experience.
By Shubhraneel P
•Sep 16, 2020
The course content was good but the versions are not updated wasting a lot of time in assignments.
By vijay c s
•Oct 24, 2017
The course is pitched at a introductory level. I would have like to have more practical tutorials.
By Andre N
•May 11, 2019
Good course, however lots of problems with assignment notebooks not working the way they should
By Alexander W
•Sep 3, 2019
This course is interesting and about a very important topic, but it urgently needs an update!
By Tsz W K
•Oct 22, 2017
Less organised to the previous three courses. However, it still introduces useful techniques.
By Ling G
•Aug 31, 2017
I like the lecture very much. If the lecture can cover more example codes it iwll be greater.
By Thomas P
•Aug 27, 2017
Good course content, but no in-depth discussion of topics. Assignments are also very buggy.
By Paula C R
•Aug 4, 2017
I think the course was superficial and could be better explored. It's good start, though.
By Shubhankar M
•Dec 25, 2020
It is an important course but instruction felt incomplete while doing the assignments.
By Josh C
•Mar 14, 2019
The contents are good, but the online autograding system really need to be improved.
By Kartikey S
•Jan 5, 2019
Some topics are hastily explained and maybe more content was needed in this course.
By Stephane C
•Dec 9, 2018
Week3 and 4. Too much of strange bugs with the auto grader. Not enougth examples...
By Vicente P
•Jul 29, 2019
I think the course need a better speaker and more notebook hours to be enhanced.
By Maha Y
•Jan 14, 2019
Need to show the slides for longer in the videos. But good learning experience.
By Qian H
•Oct 3, 2017
The homework is quite not related to the lecture. And it is so hard to finish.
By Eric S
•Sep 27, 2018
Most assigmets were not in the notes. Still everyhting seems really usefull.
By Raivis J
•Aug 11, 2018
Graded assignments need more grounding in practically applicable situations.
By George M J
•Nov 15, 2018
Good content.
Had to spend way too much time fighting the auto-grader.
By Zhizhong S
•Jan 7, 2021
The course is not well organized comparing with the other four.
By CARNEMOLLA B
•Jul 8, 2019
Contenuti troppo superficiali, gli assignment troppo specifici