I completed this course as the last course in the Sports Performance Analytics specialization so my review will look at the course in this context.
My main observation would be that the issues with (the absence) of overall specialization design for the Sports Performance Analytics specialization have really come to the forefront during this course. What basic assumptions were made about learners when this specialization was designed? Who is this specialization for? Who is the target audience? Along the specialization, we move from "coding babysitting" to pretty advanced codes with no hint or explanation as for where the wild variation in coding skills is supposed to come from on the side of the learner. The same can be said for some of the maths content of the specialization as well. Sadly, there seems to be no real target audience here that would elevate all the courses onto the same platform - it really seems like there is a large amount of complete randomness here - which shows lack of design. If in some earlier courses learners are spoon-fed through some pretty basic coding steps, then why is a coding hurricane unleashed on them in Course 5? If learners are supposed to be able to grasp the coding content in Course 5, then why do they have to endure the code toddle in earlier courses? Etc. Something is gravely missing from the basic design template of this whole specialization, or maybe, it is the basic design template in its entirety that is missing.
Course 5, this current course, also suffers some pretty sloppy assignment content, which seems to have caused a lot of resentment among earlier learners, yet remain largely unaddressed by the original course authors (even though some folks, mysteriously labeled as "Staff" in the module discussion forums, do work pretty hard to make the course and assessment content more accessible to learners - thanks, Brian, whoever you may be!), together with some other instances of sloppy design, course content, or editing.
There also seems to be a rather wild discrepancy in this course between what is delivered in the lectures and what is assessed in the assignments.
It also seems to be the case to me that this current course is badly adjusted for distance learning. Many of the issues encountered could be effectively addressed in a brick uni setting but are incredibly hard to manage in an online setting. This shows to further course design inefficiencies.
Well, what can I say. I have completed the specialization. The content itself was fascinating, the lecturers (mostly) very competent and pleasant to listen to. The problems are numerous, and the question marks are even more numerous. I do not regret enrolling, but I must observe that with a little more care and attention, this course and the entire specialization could have been presented in a much more learner-friendly way, leading to much more rewarding and trouble-free learner experiences, and the fact that that little extra was not invested in the course and the specialization is downright disturbing.
I also found the amount of advertising included in this current course quite disconcerting.