Good

good

best

good

Good

good

ok

The instruction for the assignments were less clear in this course. I wasn't always sure what needed to be included and how. For all of the graded assignments the instructions for how to submit on the first page were not correct for submitting on the 'my submission' page. I could tell I was not the only one having difficulty because the peer's I reviewed seemed to have the same trouble or had made the same mistakes I did. Also, since the work is peer reviewed if that person reviewing did not understand the assignment they often did not understand how to review my work.

You cannot create a PDF in Miro from Safari without upgrading. This seems to be an accessibility issue.

This course heavily relied on peer feedback for me to gain the most out of it. The theoretical parts were helpful during the assignments, but the instructor was very bland and often seemed disinterested. This isn't me blaming just the instructor. While the course could've used some quizzes in between to help me remember, the main issue would be the pacing. It's a hard task to take interviews needed for this course during COVID times.

But, on a positive note, I really admired how the templates and exemplars were used here and it helped me so much when I was in a spot of bother. This course can be improved though.

3/5

Some of the courses were interesting. but it was mostly Information I remember learning in the early years of high school. and the activities felt tedious at times. The parts about equity don't make much sense either. If I am making an app for mountain climbers attempting to climb Mt Everest I shouldn't make sure to include more transgender and female participants in my just because they were excluded from research in the past. 90% of climbers are male. I should therefore have a 90% male research group in order to get the most accurate information. Lessons like these can harm a company rather than help it.

1. The instructions imparted, at places do not match the version of FIGMA that we download. Many operations as suggested by instructures or course material coul not be done. IT SHOULD BE CORRECTED.

2. The evaluation process is faulty. Wtin in this course there are two instances where I was asked to resubmit - the grade instruction were wrong. I resubmitted the exact same file and test was cleared.

3. The comments provided are flimsy and not of much use.

Instructions were not clear enough and not enough resources for learning were offered. For example, I found conducting interviews remotely extremely difficult because we were not taught how to record user's screen movements remotely, and a better solution would have been to offer multiple extra sets of instructions for how to do remote recording.

The content is good but, differently from previous courses, this one is all scrambled and data mixed up in terms of activities and guidance to complete the presentations that are requested. It made me spend double the time I did with previous ones to complete the activities.

In the usability study,it is a little bit overwhelming that we have to list at least 3 insights to get the point, which is mean if somebody make a very logical app that bring user very good experience has to" make up" some story for the point...

The course was interesting, but the assignments were not quite clearly formulated, some of them did not have a full-fledged example, so it was difficult to figure out what exactly needed to be done.

Fantastic information, can't wait to build my app a bit more! Assignment instructions needs to be more clear and the timeline needs to be fine tuned for the time consuming amount of work required.

This so far is the slower path course. It took me a bit longer than the others. Sometimes I felt not going anywhere and repeting.

In general is a good course once part of the others

Please turn up the volume and teach as in Courses 1 and 2. Teach with fun and a smile on your face. This guy is teaching like he's being held hostage by Google.

Can be a little bit more detailed about certain methods, especially affinity diagramming and gleaming insights. Week 3-4 was a mess because of this.

Something are very tedious in the sense not explaining in depth such as tools like figma so I have to "google" how to do certain things overall

The worst about this course is the peer review. A lot of users don't follow the rule brick and give you a grade without explaining why.

Definitely more drudgery than the prior course within the Google UX certification - hard to get through and some holes in the content.

I think this section could be broken down further, it was a bit confusing figuring out what needed to be submitted for the assignment.

This was a great course to start, but toward the end some of the assignments and directions felt disjointed and hard to follow.